Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;ZoidMeister, post: 5293177, member: 114169&quot;]<p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]1222318[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>And you raise and excellent point, one that I was unfamiliar with.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>HOWEVER</b>, you are missing (or intentionally ignoring) a couple of salient facts with your allegory above.</p><p><br /></p><p>The arguments are not equivalent, therefore your conclusions are understandably flawed.</p><p><br /></p><p>Not being fluent in Chinese characters, I cannot read or discern the markings and / or dates of the coin above, however . . . . . . . .</p><p><br /></p><p>To wit:</p><p><br /></p><ol> <li>I am guessing the dates and features of the coin above are those of a coin that actually exists - was actually minted for use.&nbsp;&nbsp; This is not equivalent with Dan Carr&#039;s examples.&nbsp; <b>Flaw #1</b></li> <li>I am guessing the coin above was struck with the intent to defraud.&nbsp; This is not equivalent with Dan Carr&#039;s examples.&nbsp; <b>Flaw #2</b></li> <li>I am guessing the maker of the coin above did not seek tremendous amounts of publicity, publishing the total mintages, dates of production, HIS IDENTITY . . . .&nbsp; This is not equivalent with Dan Carr&#039;s examples.&nbsp; <b>Strike #3, and you&#039;re out.</b></li> </ol><p><br /></p><p>Try a better example for your next &quot;argument.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>Z[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in