Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Paddy54, post: 3407369, member: 19250&quot;]Yes correct their date is the variety. I meant to change that and forgot...to med date.</p><p>However one must admit that does look huge compared to 1860 dates...they are so small and thin numerals. I believe this design for thinner smaller numbers was due to the fact lower mintages,and smaller dates could be relapsed , reworked, to accommodate the new year date. And mid 1860&#039;s saw mintages below 10,000 coins! But the entire series has some unreal changes in the evolution of this series designs.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in