Sounds good to me. Mine is still unopened in the sealed box from the US Mint ready to ship. How about a 1916 D gold merc with full bands?
This has me on an amusing line of thought - it can't be "counterfeiting" if you overstrike a real coin with that exact coin, just better....
GOT MINE TODAY!! WHOOHOO! They are beautiful! I will take photos this weekend, I need to setup my microscope. Meanwhile, something was mentioned about potential stretch marks, in my mind I was dreading that they would look like the stretch marks on my wife. Neither on the coins shows stretch marks. However, I do see the overstrike on the reverse of the dime, is very likely the dime use had a 10 degree (or so) rotation. It is quite interesting to watch this, never seen it before. Walking Liberty shows no overstrike, but the strike looks a little weak, still, the details are very good. These are just my initial observations. More details and photos this weekend.
Not being super critical, just giving my own opinion. I don't care much for the merc or walking liberty half over strikes. They look great, too great even. I think it might be cheaper to get a genuine unc coin of these, so I don't understand the allure of just a fantasy date. Now the standing liberty quarter, all barber coinage -- these are types that I may never be able to afford in nice unc grades, as genuine coins. An overstrike would be like owning a significant treasure then, for a really reasonable price. Even a barber half overstrike on ebay, graded, at 150 or so is a tiny fraction of the price of a genuine unc coin (just a unc 62 or 63, and over strikes are probably 68 or 69 so that makes it an even better deal). Unfortunately I missed the release of these overstrikes. I hope I don't miss anything else
The thing I like is as you pointed out being able to get a BU Barber half and a SLQ Type 1 at reasonable price.
Far be it from me to get over heated Eddie........I don't even collect the stuff. I'm an avid observer, but have never indulged in the genre.......