Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
New coin but it is a bit of compromise...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 4555021, member: 110350"]I understand, but in many cases I'm not sure guessing is required. There seems to be an overwhelming consensus that these coins were drachms (although I have no idea if anyone knows what people in Istros actually called them, and haven't tried to research that question). That's the reason I asked in the first place why you called yours a stater. In general, though, it seems to me that the approach of classifying only by metal and diameter, while it does avoid the need for speculation about names of denominations, can have its drawbacks too. If you have two Istros silver coins of this type and one is 19 mm. and the other 21 mm., that doesn't make them different kinds of coins. There has to be a range of the diameters within which particular coin-types fall, which I suppose is the point of the AE 1, 2, 3, and 4 system for LRBs. But even with that kind of system, shouldn't weight also be taken into account? I'm sure there are cases of two coins made of the same metal where the one with the smaller diameter actually weighs substantially more, and was clearly a higher denomination.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 4555021, member: 110350"]I understand, but in many cases I'm not sure guessing is required. There seems to be an overwhelming consensus that these coins were drachms (although I have no idea if anyone knows what people in Istros actually called them, and haven't tried to research that question). That's the reason I asked in the first place why you called yours a stater. In general, though, it seems to me that the approach of classifying only by metal and diameter, while it does avoid the need for speculation about names of denominations, can have its drawbacks too. If you have two Istros silver coins of this type and one is 19 mm. and the other 21 mm., that doesn't make them different kinds of coins. There has to be a range of the diameters within which particular coin-types fall, which I suppose is the point of the AE 1, 2, 3, and 4 system for LRBs. But even with that kind of system, shouldn't weight also be taken into account? I'm sure there are cases of two coins made of the same metal where the one with the smaller diameter actually weighs substantially more, and was clearly a higher denomination.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
New coin but it is a bit of compromise...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...