Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
New blog: numismaticfakes
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2405216, member: 19463"]This is the problem I see with most fakes databases. Looking at this new blog, I see several really obvious fakes from style and a few that I can see having a bit of a suggestion of a cast. This Philip is shown fake because it appears on a page of fakes in another database where it is one of several matching in style but not striking details so we call it "struck from modern dies". Not being an expert in coins of the type, I could neither confirm nor deny that interpretation. It would help if such listings were accompanied with more detailed explanations of the evidence. For example, being a cast with sisters identical in every respect is all the evidence required. Being struck from dies completely unknown before last year with the sudden appearance of a dozen examples could use at least mention as could microscopic evidence of dies cut with power rotary tools. I am not questioning this coin being fake but simply stating that a resource would be more useful to my education with a bit more hand holding and walking through the process that led to the verdict beyond copying a listing in another database that offers no more detail. </p><p><br /></p><p>The killer here is probably 'wrong style' which is very hard to put into words that will be clear to those of us on the outside. I see serious style problems with the Agrippa asses shown but am a bit more familiar with other coins of that type even though it is not a specialty of mine either. I many cases, illustrating a half dozen genuine dies would allow the bad one to stand out but the illustration of a half dozen die duplicates (not mold duplicates) shows little more than the fact they exist. </p><p><br /></p><p>As a criticism of the blog, I would offer the opinion that it will decreasingly useful as time passes because it will require indexing if we are to find a specific coin of interest. Now it is an interesting read but when it is ten time or a hundred times the size we will need a way of finding something other than the order in which it was posted. This indexing can be the difference between a blog and a 'proper' web resource.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2405216, member: 19463"]This is the problem I see with most fakes databases. Looking at this new blog, I see several really obvious fakes from style and a few that I can see having a bit of a suggestion of a cast. This Philip is shown fake because it appears on a page of fakes in another database where it is one of several matching in style but not striking details so we call it "struck from modern dies". Not being an expert in coins of the type, I could neither confirm nor deny that interpretation. It would help if such listings were accompanied with more detailed explanations of the evidence. For example, being a cast with sisters identical in every respect is all the evidence required. Being struck from dies completely unknown before last year with the sudden appearance of a dozen examples could use at least mention as could microscopic evidence of dies cut with power rotary tools. I am not questioning this coin being fake but simply stating that a resource would be more useful to my education with a bit more hand holding and walking through the process that led to the verdict beyond copying a listing in another database that offers no more detail. The killer here is probably 'wrong style' which is very hard to put into words that will be clear to those of us on the outside. I see serious style problems with the Agrippa asses shown but am a bit more familiar with other coins of that type even though it is not a specialty of mine either. I many cases, illustrating a half dozen genuine dies would allow the bad one to stand out but the illustration of a half dozen die duplicates (not mold duplicates) shows little more than the fact they exist. As a criticism of the blog, I would offer the opinion that it will decreasingly useful as time passes because it will require indexing if we are to find a specific coin of interest. Now it is an interesting read but when it is ten time or a hundred times the size we will need a way of finding something other than the order in which it was posted. This indexing can be the difference between a blog and a 'proper' web resource.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
New blog: numismaticfakes
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...