Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
New Ancients: Greek, Indo, & ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 949933, member: 19463"]I'm a beginner in Indian but would guess your second coin as Kumaragupta I rather than one of the Kashatrapas that should have the mountain reverse. Perhaps someone here can straighten me out on this. </p><p><br /></p><p>The punchmarked coin is harder. Each piece of silver received five punches on one side and one on the other. They always overlap and wipe out some detail from each other. If you find one with five full and complete marks, it is a fake. Yours is a bigger mess than most. There are many kinds with a couple being much more common than most of the rest so they make a good place to start seeing if you can recognize the marks. The problem is that most used the same mark #1 and each mark after that narrows down the choices. If you have a clear strike of one particular mark, ID is simple but if your clear mark is another, ID may not be possible at my level of study. I attach one I believe to be a Samprati 216-207 BC that seems more clear than many and may be what yours is.... or not. I'd just call it Mauryan c. 200 BC.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 949933, member: 19463"]I'm a beginner in Indian but would guess your second coin as Kumaragupta I rather than one of the Kashatrapas that should have the mountain reverse. Perhaps someone here can straighten me out on this. The punchmarked coin is harder. Each piece of silver received five punches on one side and one on the other. They always overlap and wipe out some detail from each other. If you find one with five full and complete marks, it is a fake. Yours is a bigger mess than most. There are many kinds with a couple being much more common than most of the rest so they make a good place to start seeing if you can recognize the marks. The problem is that most used the same mark #1 and each mark after that narrows down the choices. If you have a clear strike of one particular mark, ID is simple but if your clear mark is another, ID may not be possible at my level of study. I attach one I believe to be a Samprati 216-207 BC that seems more clear than many and may be what yours is.... or not. I'd just call it Mauryan c. 200 BC.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
New Ancients: Greek, Indo, & ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...