Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;rick, post: 68709, member: 1235&quot;]wow, you were close on the NGC!&nbsp; Actually spot on with the 1799.&nbsp; AU55.&nbsp; The odd thing is they did these one after the other, and they rated the 98 as XF45 and the 99 as AU55.&nbsp; When I look at them, I think the two should be reversed.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>But I completely agree with your assessment.&nbsp; I don&#039;t know how you could look at the 98 and call that XF, then look at the 99 and call that AU.&nbsp; Clearly there is more rub on the later year.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in