Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
New acquisition--Licinius I (half?) follis
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3145404, member: 19463"]Those are very interesting overstrikes! This also explains a bit of my preference for coins of Constantine struck by mints controlled by Licinius (one was shown above in post #6) and for Licinius in mints controlled by Constantine. I have not made an in-depth study of the matter but the fact seems clear that coins struck during the period we call Late Roman rarely circulated for a long time due to changing standards while hoard evidence from the early empire shows some coins stayed around for over a century. I would enjoy a summary of this situation if anyone has it at hand. For example, were all two soldiers, two standards coins pulled or did they circulate besides the two soldiers, one standard version? Did Falling Horsemen with A in the reverse field circulate with those with Γ? </p><p><br /></p><p>After the failure of the three denomination FTR system, I have one second tier (soldier/captives) coin that was upgraded to a Falling Horseman but this is not commonly seen. Is there a later FH of AE3 size overstruck on a Phoenix from the first period? I would love to have that one. </p><p><br /></p><p>Constantius Gallus FH3 struck on a Constantius II soldier with two captives from Aquileia:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]804759[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3145404, member: 19463"]Those are very interesting overstrikes! This also explains a bit of my preference for coins of Constantine struck by mints controlled by Licinius (one was shown above in post #6) and for Licinius in mints controlled by Constantine. I have not made an in-depth study of the matter but the fact seems clear that coins struck during the period we call Late Roman rarely circulated for a long time due to changing standards while hoard evidence from the early empire shows some coins stayed around for over a century. I would enjoy a summary of this situation if anyone has it at hand. For example, were all two soldiers, two standards coins pulled or did they circulate besides the two soldiers, one standard version? Did Falling Horsemen with A in the reverse field circulate with those with Γ? After the failure of the three denomination FTR system, I have one second tier (soldier/captives) coin that was upgraded to a Falling Horseman but this is not commonly seen. Is there a later FH of AE3 size overstruck on a Phoenix from the first period? I would love to have that one. Constantius Gallus FH3 struck on a Constantius II soldier with two captives from Aquileia: [ATTACH=full]804759[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
New acquisition--Licinius I (half?) follis
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...