Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mill rat41, post: 519794, member: 16688&quot;]Wow, a &quot;stampede&quot; of responses.&nbsp; I was planning on sending it in for authentication.&nbsp;&nbsp; Comparing to a regular 1937D:&nbsp; the e pluribus unum does appear to be slightly higher off the back (and I mean SLIGHTLY higher),&nbsp; on the 3 legs I do see a little hazy area behind the neck (roughly on a diagonal line from the top of the one in the date to the 5 o&#039;clock postion of the end of the larger feather of the indian), the groin of the 3 leg appears to be longer and pointier than that of the regular, the rear leg does look quite ratty compared to the regular. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>One other thing that seems different is the length of the large feather.&nbsp; One the 3 leg it seems shorter than on that of the regular.&nbsp; Also,the feather on the back of the head (the one that only the bottom tip shows behind the neck) seems smaller than on the regular nickel.&nbsp; These differences might be because my regular has less wear than the 3 leg.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I stacked the two on top of each other and the sizes match exactly.&nbsp; Comparing the rims, they are the same thickness.&nbsp; Gonna get someone with more experience to take a look at it tommorrow.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Handsometoad you have a pm.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in