Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Tyler Graton, post: 2844708, member: 85787&quot;]What books is referring to I believe, is the fact that when you say that things are unique when they aren&#039;t. It misleads people. Very simple. Don&#039;t call something that it&#039;s not. Reason? Well, lets just take this post. In the title you state &quot;new 1991 double(d) die error Lincoln cent&quot;</p><p>Okay so just say I am new, and I just found a 1991 cent that looks like it has a doubled die. I would go on google, type and type in &quot;1991 double die error Lincoln cent&quot; and most likely the first thing that will pop up is your post. That person will then look at your coin, and maybe see the same thing that&#039;s on your coin, and will most likely think they found a doubled die. This is something that I went through when I first started. And I too myself fought him about his opinion thinking he was just being ridiculous. I even told him to ignore me please. And he said No because he a good guy. He understands how difficult this hobby is. I remember this. I should have been listening to him. Even you thought it was a doubled die, so here is what I suggest. When you post things, you should just post the date, mint mark and say please help. If you are 100% sure it is what you are calling it, and know that for a fact, THATS when you should label it what it is. </p><p>No sense in calling something a doubled die when it&#039;s not. Misleads many people. And it&#039;s frustrating as you know when you think you have a doubled die because someone saw your post from google, and send it in for grading costing 30 bucks to find out that it&#039;s die deteration or plating issues.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in