Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;RBurk, post: 7441222, member: 105984&quot;]Interesting posts, and all are well taken.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Believe it or not, I have extremely low expectations of &quot;getting rich&quot; from this coin or even the &quot;more significant&quot; finds I&#039;ve had such as a 1936 DDO, a D/S and many of the less significant DDR&#039;s from the memorial cents I&#039;m going through right now.&nbsp; I probably have a dozen or two of them.&nbsp; They have not been posted here because of the obvious lower significance and the fact that they are well documented and understood.&nbsp; A few of my finds may be worth 2 or 3 digits.&nbsp; I don&#039;t try to sell them though because I enjoy having them in my collection.</p><p><br /></p><p>Regarding the argument of &quot;if you need a microscope...&quot; I&#039;m going to disagree.&nbsp; First, my eyes are over 60 years of age and don&#039;t work like they used to.&nbsp; A loupe does not magnify most of my coins enough for me to be able to inspect them.&nbsp; I can see the anomaly of the coin photographed for this original post with a loupe, but not well.&nbsp; I would have missed both the 1936 DD and the D/S without the microscope.&nbsp; Additionally, many of the errors considered to have some value (such as listed on NGC Variety Plus and Variety Vista) require magnification to see, at least for many of us.&nbsp; Think about the less significant DDO&#039;s, the designer initials, etc.&nbsp; They are still significant and some even valuable.&nbsp; I remember the day I was able to see a pattern on 1mm surface mount capacitor without magnification.&nbsp; Those days are long past now.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in