Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;900fine, post: 462709, member: 6036&quot;]That&#039;s right.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p>They shouldn&#039;t.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p>Agreed... but here, we&#039;re close to getting back into the &quot;technical vs. market grading&quot; discussion.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Along those lines... should the TPG decide how many levels a coin should drop with a given amount of problems ? I say no. That is in the eyes of the buyer. Of course, <i>everything</i> is in the eyes of the buyer - TPG or no. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The impact of problems is difficult to standardize - much more difficult than wear. &quot;Good honest wear&quot; is predictable, and tends to have a consistent pattern - problems do not.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p>That&#039;s exactly right. That&#039;s what NCS does. They evaluate &quot;details&quot;, list the problem(s), and stress (on the slab) &quot;details grade does not determine value&quot;.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in