Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2373363, member: 1892&quot;]If a coin would be Mint State aside the damage/cleaning, no further granularity of grade determination <b>is even possible </b>since the grade is based on technical condition and eye appeal. </p><p><br /></p><p>Further, &quot;Net&quot; would need to be be more strictly defined into a rule we would all use specifically for the purposes of your threads. ANACS used to use &quot;Net&quot; grades to describe the &quot;righteous coin&quot; grade level at which it felt the damaged coin to be worth. These days, &quot;Net&quot; grades are the strict technical grade at which the coin would sit had the damage not been present. Which rule are your respondents using? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Me, when using the term &quot;Net&quot; I always offer <i>strict technical detail</i>. Others in this thread have already used the &quot;value&quot; definition of &quot;Net.&quot; So you&#039;re never going to reach anything resembling a consensus.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;This coin is Uncirculated Details to me - I feel it hadn&#039;t circulated before its&#039; encounter with a wire brush - and there will never be enough information available for me to determine any other grade for it. I&#039;ve no idea how nice it was before.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in