Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;baseball21, post: 2371768, member: 76863&quot;]Very true we will never know for certain without a time machine but we do know it needed to be some combination of mother nature abusing the obverse while the reverse was relatively protected.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Considering we are looking most likely at a 150 years of mother natures abuse and could be upwards of 200 years I do think that coin was uncirculated or at the very least a very high AU when she got her hands on it.&nbsp; The lettering on the obverse is still quite strong and even with the obverse there is still a good amount of detail left considering how long it was likely exposed.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>From a purely technical standpoint UNC or AU details is likely technically correct, that said in the age of market grading FR/PO Details would be more of the proper net grade[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in