Nervous About The Cubs Game So Here's A GTG

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by IBetASilverDollar, Oct 12, 2017.

  1. IBetASilverDollar

    IBetASilverDollar Well-Known Member

    In an attempt to distract my mind for 15 seconds here's a recent pickup, GTG!

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    ron_c likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. IBetASilverDollar

    IBetASilverDollar Well-Known Member

    Here are seller pictures which seem too bright to me seeing it in hand but may show more detail than my camera pics so worth posting and maybe I'm just used to taking bad pictures

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  4. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    65+ PL
    ...I'm going to guess that the check is not baggy and just has frost breaks and the fields look clean
     
  5. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    1st photo 64PL
    2nd photo 65PL
     
    IBetASilverDollar likes this.
  6. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    I'm all in at 65PL. Those fields are very clean looking for a PL coin. I'm pretty sure that cheek is mostly just frost breaks. It's a sweet looking coin that I am pretty sure looks outstanding in hand.
     
    IBetASilverDollar likes this.
  7. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Variety Collector

  8. NSP

    NSP Well-Known Member

    I'll go 64 PL. And it looks like your Cubs are more adept at making it out of the first round than my Indians!
     
    BigMike and IBetASilverDollar like this.
  9. FBLfinder

    FBLfinder Member

    Ms 64... although it is frosty looking i should see a reflection in the fields of a camera of something for that proof like grade. Beautiful coin.
     
    IBetASilverDollar likes this.
  10. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Well-Known Member

    64PL. Very nice looking coin.
     
    IBetASilverDollar likes this.
  11. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat dave700x

  12. IBetASilverDollar

    IBetASilverDollar Well-Known Member

    What a crazy game, unreal but I'll take it!

    I love the Indians this year they scared me more than anyone shocked about the way they went out but they'll be back
     
    NSP likes this.
  13. coinsareus10

    coinsareus10 Active Member

    65 PL.Now you should post an IHC.:)
     
    IBetASilverDollar likes this.
  14. ron_c

    ron_c Well-Known Member

  15. IBetASilverDollar

    IBetASilverDollar Well-Known Member

    Glad to see my thoughts pretty well confirmed that this is a pretty nice for the grade example, I personally thought it was a 64+ and gladly paid about half what that would have been. Pretty impossible to tell PL from DMPL in the photos so not worried about that part.

    [​IMG]
     
    Paddy54 and Pickin and Grinin like this.
  16. I was actually debating going DMPL, but the reverse held it back imo. FWIW i made my assessment from the 1st set of photos and the reverse in the 2nd set looks better imo.
     
  17. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    I think PCGS was strict with the grade (63+ only?) but generous with DMPL. It looks borderline PL to me, the reverse in particular is only semi-PL. It's still a very nice coin which I'd love to have in my collection...
     
  18. Dynoking

    Dynoking Active Member

     
  19. IBetASilverDollar

    IBetASilverDollar Well-Known Member

    It's definitely not borderline PL, it's a clear DMPL. I have a bunch of regular PL Morgans and this is definitely much deeper mirrors than all of them.

    Maybe these images in regular daylight make it look more DMPLish? I'm terrible at imaging coins.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Pickin and Grinin and jtlee321 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page