Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Nero's 2025 Christmas coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="nerosmyfavorite68, post: 26611159, member: 134416"]These are my photos. I've <i>always</i> had problems with coin photography. However I made somewhat of a breakthrough today and these have improved from execrable to only slightly stinky.</p><p><br /></p><p>Both coins are ex-Harmer Rooke, NYC. Are they still around? I've seen their name from time to time when coin provenances are included.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have to work on coloration, but I made massive improvements insofar as focus today. My new photography station is a desk with an overhead lamp (has an adjustable elbow), and there's also a window overhead. Today is overcast so no window action.</p><p><br /></p><p>The quadrigatus is much more attractive than the photo. The stately gunmetal grey toning is uniform, satin, and much more attractive than shown here:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1696362[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Anonymous (225-215 BC) - AR Quadrigatus (6.27g.) Sear RCV 031 ex Harmer Rooke.</p><p><br /></p><p>The Thasos tetradrachm is brighter than the above coin.</p><p>*Can anyone supply a reference number? I don't have any references for these.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1696365[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Thasos - after 148 BC - AR Tetradrachm (16.62g.) ex Harmer Rooke</p><p><br /></p><p>There were also low-grade stocking stuffers from the LCS. They're all dark. This is the only image I have ready. What I suspect happened was at some point long ago they were coated with Blue Ribbon or something similar.</p><p><br /></p><p>The A2 follis (I also don't have calipers yet) is circa 35 mm. and really thin. The photo actually shows much more detail than is seen with the naked eye. I have to look under magnification to ascertain what's up and what's down in person; the obverse especially is very faint.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1696366[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>c. 35mm, 10.64g. Fair/Good. DOC number unknown (difficult to tell if there were any ornaments. Since the book/nimbus on the obverse is worn it'd be tough to guess in any case. Thin fabric.</p><p><br /></p><p>That was the 'best' of the stocking stuffers.</p><p><br /></p><p>Depending on how the images turn out I may have an ID question for the Nicaea provincial.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="nerosmyfavorite68, post: 26611159, member: 134416"]These are my photos. I've [I]always[/I] had problems with coin photography. However I made somewhat of a breakthrough today and these have improved from execrable to only slightly stinky. Both coins are ex-Harmer Rooke, NYC. Are they still around? I've seen their name from time to time when coin provenances are included. I have to work on coloration, but I made massive improvements insofar as focus today. My new photography station is a desk with an overhead lamp (has an adjustable elbow), and there's also a window overhead. Today is overcast so no window action. The quadrigatus is much more attractive than the photo. The stately gunmetal grey toning is uniform, satin, and much more attractive than shown here: [ATTACH=full]1696362[/ATTACH] Anonymous (225-215 BC) - AR Quadrigatus (6.27g.) Sear RCV 031 ex Harmer Rooke. The Thasos tetradrachm is brighter than the above coin. *Can anyone supply a reference number? I don't have any references for these. [ATTACH=full]1696365[/ATTACH] Thasos - after 148 BC - AR Tetradrachm (16.62g.) ex Harmer Rooke There were also low-grade stocking stuffers from the LCS. They're all dark. This is the only image I have ready. What I suspect happened was at some point long ago they were coated with Blue Ribbon or something similar. The A2 follis (I also don't have calipers yet) is circa 35 mm. and really thin. The photo actually shows much more detail than is seen with the naked eye. I have to look under magnification to ascertain what's up and what's down in person; the obverse especially is very faint. [ATTACH=full]1696366[/ATTACH] c. 35mm, 10.64g. Fair/Good. DOC number unknown (difficult to tell if there were any ornaments. Since the book/nimbus on the obverse is worn it'd be tough to guess in any case. Thin fabric. That was the 'best' of the stocking stuffers. Depending on how the images turn out I may have an ID question for the Nicaea provincial.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Nero's 2025 Christmas coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...