Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Nemausus dupondius opinions sought
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1652047, member: 19463"]Both sides are shown in the photo. The issue was not consistent regarding the die axis. Some were oriented as US coins, inverted or 6H. Some were like British coins, medal format, upright or 12H. The new half was oriented half way between at 9H so the body of the croc was behind Augustus and the legend COL NEM was behind Agrippa. I have seen one very roughly broken coin that had two necks and one head (I think it was Augustus') but I think that was a failure rather than intentional break. All others were separated between the two portraits. I did see one whole coin that had a straight chisel cut between the portraits but had not been broken. It was like a kit ready to be made into change if needed. I wanted that one but the seller valued it higher than I did. </p><p><br /></p><p>I suppose any coin could be broken for change but the practice seems to have been a regular practice on these adversed portrait coins. I'm not suggesting that you should buy a half coin for full price but these are not defective items as much as they are asses the way the practice of the day produced them. To my eye, the random die axis orientation making the pairings of remaining detail equally random adds to the interest of the series.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1652047, member: 19463"]Both sides are shown in the photo. The issue was not consistent regarding the die axis. Some were oriented as US coins, inverted or 6H. Some were like British coins, medal format, upright or 12H. The new half was oriented half way between at 9H so the body of the croc was behind Augustus and the legend COL NEM was behind Agrippa. I have seen one very roughly broken coin that had two necks and one head (I think it was Augustus') but I think that was a failure rather than intentional break. All others were separated between the two portraits. I did see one whole coin that had a straight chisel cut between the portraits but had not been broken. It was like a kit ready to be made into change if needed. I wanted that one but the seller valued it higher than I did. I suppose any coin could be broken for change but the practice seems to have been a regular practice on these adversed portrait coins. I'm not suggesting that you should buy a half coin for full price but these are not defective items as much as they are asses the way the practice of the day produced them. To my eye, the random die axis orientation making the pairings of remaining detail equally random adds to the interest of the series.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Nemausus dupondius opinions sought
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...