Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Need your opinion - Auction house terminology.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 3205902, member: 112"]My last paragraph in that post was not being addressed to you Books.</p><p><br /></p><p>But you're right I didn't answer your question, I realized that myself after I had signed off and shut down for the day. When I used the term newly discovered coins I suppose the best way to explain it is to say I was talking about coins that are for one reason or another, remarkable or newsworthy, special in some way, very scarce maybe even rare (and when I say rare that means less than 10 are known to even exist)- but yet unknown to the numismatic public in general, coins they/we were previously unaware that somebody had them in their collection, or maybe for whatever reason just happened to suddenly turn up. Coins like that are what I was referring to.</p><p><br /></p><p>And with coins like that, yeah, I believe you can count them on one hand and still have fingers left over.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is an example of one of those coins -</p><p><a href="http://www.coinnews.net/2018/08/21/1538-8-reales-silver-dollar-realizes-528000/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coinnews.net/2018/08/21/1538-8-reales-silver-dollar-realizes-528000/" rel="nofollow">http://www.coinnews.net/2018/08/21/1538-8-reales-silver-dollar-realizes-528000/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Years ago, I'm thinking it was in the 90's when they (3 of them) were first discovered (came to the attention of the public) - THAT was newsworthy ! And as you can see from that link they still are today.</p><p><br /></p><p>Another example would be the coin that saved George Dixon's life, the $20 double eagle. Everybody knew it existed, the story was very well known. But when that coin was newly discovered - that too was news !</p><p><br /></p><p>And this isn't addressed to you Books, but for those who wish to dispute things, with the kind of thing I'm talking about, 3 of those coins being found doesn't mean you use 3 fingers, you only use 1, because it's <u>the find of the specific coin</u> that I'm counting, not the number of coins that happened to be there.</p><p><br /></p><p>As I've been saying all along - the definition thing - it's a matter of how one intends the words he uses, what they mean when he uses them, not how somebody else interprets them ![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 3205902, member: 112"]My last paragraph in that post was not being addressed to you Books. But you're right I didn't answer your question, I realized that myself after I had signed off and shut down for the day. When I used the term newly discovered coins I suppose the best way to explain it is to say I was talking about coins that are for one reason or another, remarkable or newsworthy, special in some way, very scarce maybe even rare (and when I say rare that means less than 10 are known to even exist)- but yet unknown to the numismatic public in general, coins they/we were previously unaware that somebody had them in their collection, or maybe for whatever reason just happened to suddenly turn up. Coins like that are what I was referring to. And with coins like that, yeah, I believe you can count them on one hand and still have fingers left over. This is an example of one of those coins - [url]http://www.coinnews.net/2018/08/21/1538-8-reales-silver-dollar-realizes-528000/[/url] Years ago, I'm thinking it was in the 90's when they (3 of them) were first discovered (came to the attention of the public) - THAT was newsworthy ! And as you can see from that link they still are today. Another example would be the coin that saved George Dixon's life, the $20 double eagle. Everybody knew it existed, the story was very well known. But when that coin was newly discovered - that too was news ! And this isn't addressed to you Books, but for those who wish to dispute things, with the kind of thing I'm talking about, 3 of those coins being found doesn't mean you use 3 fingers, you only use 1, because it's [U]the find of the specific coin[/U] that I'm counting, not the number of coins that happened to be there. As I've been saying all along - the definition thing - it's a matter of how one intends the words he uses, what they mean when he uses them, not how somebody else interprets them ![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Need your opinion - Auction house terminology.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...