Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Need help attributing Gallienus PROVIDENTIA AVG antoninianus
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 2883718, member: 75937"]This is a tough one because it just doesn't quite match any catalog description.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]691638[/ATTACH] </p><p>Obverse inscription is probably GALLIENVS AVG because there just doesn't seem to be enough room for IMP GALLIENVS AVG, given the overall size of the font. It's radiate and cuirassed, right. Reverse has PROVIDENTIA spelled out in full. No officina mark in the field. Obviously, there could be one in the exergue off the flan.</p><p><br /></p><p>Looking in RIC, it is similar to 266 and 267:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]691641[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>The reverse matches 266 exactly, but its obverse inscription reads IMP C P LIC GALLIENVS AVG and it's a radiate head right, not cuirassed bust right. The obverse matches 267 exactly, but the coin bears no officina marks in the fields on the reverse, so that's not it.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is a coin from Mediolanum, RIC 510:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]691643[/ATTACH] </p><p>But that obverse is a radiate head, not cuirassed bust, and there is no officina mark in the field on the reverse.</p><p><br /></p><p>That's the same coin as Cohen 880, and therefore not a match to mine:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]691644[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>The closest thing in Sear is 10338, but that obverse inscription is IMP C P LIC GALLIENVS AVG and its reverse has AVGG, not AVG. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]691650[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>And the closest I could find in <a href="http://www258.pair.com/denarius/coinage.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www258.pair.com/denarius/coinage.htm" rel="nofollow">online Göbl</a> is 1088y, from Mediolanum, which matches the description of the reverse but not the photo, which shows an S in the right field. Moreover, the obverse is same except for the ribbons from the radiate crown.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]691651[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Am I missing something? Some other reference that has my coin? Do I have an undescribed variant?</p><p><br /></p><p>Please help.</p><p><br /></p><p>And, of course, post anything you feel is relevant!![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 2883718, member: 75937"]This is a tough one because it just doesn't quite match any catalog description. [ATTACH=full]691638[/ATTACH] Obverse inscription is probably GALLIENVS AVG because there just doesn't seem to be enough room for IMP GALLIENVS AVG, given the overall size of the font. It's radiate and cuirassed, right. Reverse has PROVIDENTIA spelled out in full. No officina mark in the field. Obviously, there could be one in the exergue off the flan. Looking in RIC, it is similar to 266 and 267: [ATTACH=full]691641[/ATTACH] The reverse matches 266 exactly, but its obverse inscription reads IMP C P LIC GALLIENVS AVG and it's a radiate head right, not cuirassed bust right. The obverse matches 267 exactly, but the coin bears no officina marks in the fields on the reverse, so that's not it. There is a coin from Mediolanum, RIC 510: [ATTACH=full]691643[/ATTACH] But that obverse is a radiate head, not cuirassed bust, and there is no officina mark in the field on the reverse. That's the same coin as Cohen 880, and therefore not a match to mine: [ATTACH=full]691644[/ATTACH] The closest thing in Sear is 10338, but that obverse inscription is IMP C P LIC GALLIENVS AVG and its reverse has AVGG, not AVG. [ATTACH=full]691650[/ATTACH] And the closest I could find in [URL='http://www258.pair.com/denarius/coinage.htm']online Göbl[/URL] is 1088y, from Mediolanum, which matches the description of the reverse but not the photo, which shows an S in the right field. Moreover, the obverse is same except for the ribbons from the radiate crown. [ATTACH=full]691651[/ATTACH] Am I missing something? Some other reference that has my coin? Do I have an undescribed variant? Please help. And, of course, post anything you feel is relevant!![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Need help attributing Gallienus PROVIDENTIA AVG antoninianus
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...