Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;AnYangMan, post: 3161443, member: 87271&quot;]That is a valid point. In my initial post I mentioned that it was struck off-flan, but I agree that it rises too sharply to have a squared-off top. Class 7c, is off the table, since Raulf did not mint this subclass (or it has not been discovered yet). I should have thought of this in my initial post, but 7a is also a possibility. It shares all characteristics of 7b (Same degraded, squished bust, lack of reverse interpunction same font), minus the squared topped A:</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://www.hallshammeredcoins.com/websitepics/Henry_III_SC_Penny1_HHC4452.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://www.leodishammeredcoins.co.uk/images/large/Henry-III-Penny-Class-7a-Roger-Canterbury-Mint-S1356a-L4128_LRG.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Some of the curls are still pelleted in the primary phase of this class, but they phase out towards the end.</p><p><br /></p><p>EDIT: Ah, I see you came to the same conclusion. Nice detective work, everyone. And it is still a nice penny![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in