Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Need a grading opinion on this commodus
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 4157990, member: 85693"]An interesting discussion. And some great coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>I really like the coins of Commodus, and as several have noted, his coins are abundant on the market. They also vary wildly in style, fabric, and strike. Mostly what I look for is a good portrait - the OP has a fair-to-middling late-reign portrait, but not outstanding. And so here are my opinions and coins, based on about 3 years collecting these (which is to say I am no expert)...</p><p><br /></p><p>First off, as a bottom-feeder, I would not pay $50 for the OP, even though I do not have that one in my collection. Mostly this is because I almost never spend $50 on a single coin - that violates the Bottom Feeder Code of Conduct. But that might be typical retail - I don't really know since I don't shop retail.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for the grade, heck if I know. VF with a mushy strike? Something like that. It would certainly be a coin I'd snap up for $10 or $15 in an eBay auction, but I am not crazy about its style - especially the portrait, though it is typical for a lot of Commodus' later coins. The reverse has a certain panache however, and a full inscription - not bad at all!</p><p><br /></p><p>While I don't have the OP, I do have a Concordia, with the unusual CONCORDIAE COMMODI reverse. I paid $19 off eBay - a deal, I think. This one is, in my opinion, a lower grade than the OP (VG?), but a much finer style - I love the portrait - despite the wear, it has a fully-rounded, statue-like look - compare this with the OP's rather crude rendering around the eye and nose - a kind of shortcut "gash" you see on a lot of these:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1073006[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Commodus Denarius</b></p><p><b>(c. 189 A.D.)</b></p><p><b>Rome Mint </b></p><p>M COMM ANT P FEL AVG BRIT P P, laureate head right / CONCORDIAE COMMODI</p><p>AVG, Concordia standing left, holding patera & scepter.</p><p>RIC 198a; Cohen 43; RSC 43.</p><p>(3.09 grams / 17 mm)</p><p><br /></p><p>Hope I'm not sounding like an art professor here...but I'm feeling artsy or something today...and so I will persist...</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a denarius with a portrait of the late style similar to the OP - very crude. However, it has a rather unusual imperial reverse - Serapis. And it was under $10. So I bought it - but I do not care for the portrait, which suffers from a poor strike and wear, a very ugly obverse. If somebody told me it was a barbaric copy, I wouldn't argue with them, although the reverse is a better style:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1073036[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Commodus Denarius</b></p><p><b>(191-192 A.D.)</b></p><p><b>Rome Mint </b></p><p>L AEL AVREL COMM AVG P FEL, laureate head right / SERAPIDI CONSERV AVG,</p><p>Serapis, radiate, standing front, head left, holding branch and sceptre.</p><p>RIC 261; Sear 5695; RSC 703.</p><p>(2.56 grams / 16 mm)</p><p><br /></p><p>On the other hand, here is an example of a late Commodus of low grade, but to me with great eye-appeal - mostly because of the portrait - which provides that loutish, somehow bathetic version of Marcus Aurelius look I really like. This is a good (bad?) example of the crude fabric to be found on late Commodus denarii. Flan preparation was not a priority, but there were still some master engravers working at the mint:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1073018[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Commodus Denarius</b></p><p><b>(190-191 A.D.)</b></p><p><b>Rome Mint </b></p><p>M COMM ANT P FEL A[VG BRIT P P], laureate head right / [MIN AVG] P M TR P XVI</p><p>COS VI, Minerva walking right, holding branch in right hand, spear and shield in left.</p><p>RIC 222a; Sear 5661; RSC 358.</p><p>(2.46 grams / 18 x 16 mm)</p><p><br /></p><p>Here's one I do not like much in regards to its style. It had other things about it I liked - a Liberalitas reverse, which interests me, as they can sometimes be attributed to actual coin distribution events. Despite the wear, it is unusually heavy for a Commodus denarius (in my limited experience), but the style is rather crude, with a youthful but lumpy portrait. The deal-maker on this one was that I paid $2.75 for it, which for me is bottom-feeding at its best - that might be it's melt value! </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1073029[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Commodus Denarius</b></p><p><b>(181 A.D.)</b></p><p><b>Rome Mint </b></p><p>M COMMODVS ANTONINVS AVG, laureate head right. / LIB AVG IIII TR P VI IMP IIII COS III [PP], Liberalitas standing left holding counting board and cornucopiae.</p><p>RIC 22; RSC 307; BMC IV 53</p><p>(3.28 grams / 17 mm)</p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>Note:</b></p><p>"Struck 181 A.D., and distributed to the people, when Commodus returned to Rome." Wildwinds</p><p><br /></p><p>"Reverse depicts the 4th distribution of money to the people of Rome." FORVM post.</p><p><br /></p><p>Finally, this post gives me an excuse to post a new sestertius I just got - a fairly early issue, with the portrait less loutish, looking a bit more like his dad - but despite the wear, it there was some fine die-work with the portrait, which has a very Marcus Aurelius look to it - the young prince:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1073026[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Commodus Æ Sestertius </b></p><p><b>(183 A.D.)</b></p><p><b>Rome Mint</b></p><p>M COMMODVS AN[TONINVS AVG PI]VS, laureate head right / [TR P VIII IMPVI COS IIII P P] S-C, Victory walking right, holding trophy with both hands.</p><p>RIC 374; Cohen 898; Sear 5821.</p><p>(19.87 grams / 28 mm)</p><p><br /></p><p>I thought about giving my opinions about Commodus the ruler - I think he got a bad rap from history. But instead I'll shut up now! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie104" alt=":yawn:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 4157990, member: 85693"]An interesting discussion. And some great coins. I really like the coins of Commodus, and as several have noted, his coins are abundant on the market. They also vary wildly in style, fabric, and strike. Mostly what I look for is a good portrait - the OP has a fair-to-middling late-reign portrait, but not outstanding. And so here are my opinions and coins, based on about 3 years collecting these (which is to say I am no expert)... First off, as a bottom-feeder, I would not pay $50 for the OP, even though I do not have that one in my collection. Mostly this is because I almost never spend $50 on a single coin - that violates the Bottom Feeder Code of Conduct. But that might be typical retail - I don't really know since I don't shop retail. As for the grade, heck if I know. VF with a mushy strike? Something like that. It would certainly be a coin I'd snap up for $10 or $15 in an eBay auction, but I am not crazy about its style - especially the portrait, though it is typical for a lot of Commodus' later coins. The reverse has a certain panache however, and a full inscription - not bad at all! While I don't have the OP, I do have a Concordia, with the unusual CONCORDIAE COMMODI reverse. I paid $19 off eBay - a deal, I think. This one is, in my opinion, a lower grade than the OP (VG?), but a much finer style - I love the portrait - despite the wear, it has a fully-rounded, statue-like look - compare this with the OP's rather crude rendering around the eye and nose - a kind of shortcut "gash" you see on a lot of these: [ATTACH=full]1073006[/ATTACH] [B]Commodus Denarius (c. 189 A.D.) Rome Mint [/B] M COMM ANT P FEL AVG BRIT P P, laureate head right / CONCORDIAE COMMODI AVG, Concordia standing left, holding patera & scepter. RIC 198a; Cohen 43; RSC 43. (3.09 grams / 17 mm) Hope I'm not sounding like an art professor here...but I'm feeling artsy or something today...and so I will persist... Here is a denarius with a portrait of the late style similar to the OP - very crude. However, it has a rather unusual imperial reverse - Serapis. And it was under $10. So I bought it - but I do not care for the portrait, which suffers from a poor strike and wear, a very ugly obverse. If somebody told me it was a barbaric copy, I wouldn't argue with them, although the reverse is a better style: [ATTACH=full]1073036[/ATTACH] [B]Commodus Denarius (191-192 A.D.) Rome Mint [/B] L AEL AVREL COMM AVG P FEL, laureate head right / SERAPIDI CONSERV AVG, Serapis, radiate, standing front, head left, holding branch and sceptre. RIC 261; Sear 5695; RSC 703. (2.56 grams / 16 mm) On the other hand, here is an example of a late Commodus of low grade, but to me with great eye-appeal - mostly because of the portrait - which provides that loutish, somehow bathetic version of Marcus Aurelius look I really like. This is a good (bad?) example of the crude fabric to be found on late Commodus denarii. Flan preparation was not a priority, but there were still some master engravers working at the mint: [ATTACH=full]1073018[/ATTACH] [B]Commodus Denarius (190-191 A.D.) Rome Mint [/B] M COMM ANT P FEL A[VG BRIT P P], laureate head right / [MIN AVG] P M TR P XVI COS VI, Minerva walking right, holding branch in right hand, spear and shield in left. RIC 222a; Sear 5661; RSC 358. (2.46 grams / 18 x 16 mm) Here's one I do not like much in regards to its style. It had other things about it I liked - a Liberalitas reverse, which interests me, as they can sometimes be attributed to actual coin distribution events. Despite the wear, it is unusually heavy for a Commodus denarius (in my limited experience), but the style is rather crude, with a youthful but lumpy portrait. The deal-maker on this one was that I paid $2.75 for it, which for me is bottom-feeding at its best - that might be it's melt value! [ATTACH=full]1073029[/ATTACH] [B]Commodus Denarius (181 A.D.) Rome Mint [/B] M COMMODVS ANTONINVS AVG, laureate head right. / LIB AVG IIII TR P VI IMP IIII COS III [PP], Liberalitas standing left holding counting board and cornucopiae. RIC 22; RSC 307; BMC IV 53 (3.28 grams / 17 mm) [B] Note:[/B] "Struck 181 A.D., and distributed to the people, when Commodus returned to Rome." Wildwinds "Reverse depicts the 4th distribution of money to the people of Rome." FORVM post. Finally, this post gives me an excuse to post a new sestertius I just got - a fairly early issue, with the portrait less loutish, looking a bit more like his dad - but despite the wear, it there was some fine die-work with the portrait, which has a very Marcus Aurelius look to it - the young prince: [ATTACH=full]1073026[/ATTACH] [B]Commodus Æ Sestertius (183 A.D.) Rome Mint[/B] M COMMODVS AN[TONINVS AVG PI]VS, laureate head right / [TR P VIII IMPVI COS IIII P P] S-C, Victory walking right, holding trophy with both hands. RIC 374; Cohen 898; Sear 5821. (19.87 grams / 28 mm) I thought about giving my opinions about Commodus the ruler - I think he got a bad rap from history. But instead I'll shut up now! :yawn:[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Need a grading opinion on this commodus
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...