Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
NCLT and Commemoratives
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GSDykes, post: 3976653, member: 73321"]So, If I found a 1892 Comm. in circulation, it would be a circulating NCLT?? If it is a circulating 1/2 dollar, that<span style="color: #ff0080"> is</span> the type coin it<span style="color: #ff0000"> is</span>! Seems confusing, especially when so many "coins" are listed as NCLT, which can affect their valuations. When graded I see that they are graded as in the 1 - 70 system- MS. MS is for circulating coinage, and commemoratives, and medals? If non-MS (such as Fine, VG, et cetera) it would mean that they were abused or worn via <u>circulation </u>or exposure to the elements, yes? Also, when looking up 1/2 dollar US coins, the 1892 Columbian Ex. is not listed there, it is listed under Commemoratives, even 128 years later!</p><p>In closing (?), a proof coin is and will always be a proof coin, as that is how it was originally physically minted. But a commemorative pretends to have a twin identity, it has a face value, and it is originally a comm.. It seems that the real value is not its face value, rather its melt value. Hence, I view most comm. with suspicion as far as being true money, whereas true NCLT coins are more "real" - i.e. they do not sit in the Commemorative category, and they can with greater ease slip into circulation as legal tender. Oh, no wonder my wife thinks my head is in the clouds.</p><p>Gary in Washington[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GSDykes, post: 3976653, member: 73321"]So, If I found a 1892 Comm. in circulation, it would be a circulating NCLT?? If it is a circulating 1/2 dollar, that[COLOR=#ff0080] is[/COLOR] the type coin it[COLOR=#ff0000] is[/COLOR]! Seems confusing, especially when so many "coins" are listed as NCLT, which can affect their valuations. When graded I see that they are graded as in the 1 - 70 system- MS. MS is for circulating coinage, and commemoratives, and medals? If non-MS (such as Fine, VG, et cetera) it would mean that they were abused or worn via [U]circulation [/U]or exposure to the elements, yes? Also, when looking up 1/2 dollar US coins, the 1892 Columbian Ex. is not listed there, it is listed under Commemoratives, even 128 years later! In closing (?), a proof coin is and will always be a proof coin, as that is how it was originally physically minted. But a commemorative pretends to have a twin identity, it has a face value, and it is originally a comm.. It seems that the real value is not its face value, rather its melt value. Hence, I view most comm. with suspicion as far as being true money, whereas true NCLT coins are more "real" - i.e. they do not sit in the Commemorative category, and they can with greater ease slip into circulation as legal tender. Oh, no wonder my wife thinks my head is in the clouds. Gary in Washington[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
NCLT and Commemoratives
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...