Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;KBBPLL, post: 26738845, member: 104064&quot;]This one caught my eye, an 1891 50c Barber pattern. I&#039;d never seen it before. What&#039;s interesting is that the inner ear detail is what Barber changed in 1901, which then looked more like this pattern. He did the same with the dime obverse in 1901 - made the inner ear look more like the 1891 dime pattern. It&#039;s like he wasn&#039;t happy with them for 10 years and finally &quot;fixed&quot; it. </p><p><a href="https://www.si.edu/object/50-cents-united-states-1891:nmah_1100114" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.si.edu/object/50-cents-united-states-1891:nmah_1100114" rel="nofollow">https://www.si.edu/object/50-cents-united-states-1891:nmah_1100114</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I was also surprised that their 1913 Liberty nickel wasn&#039;t highlighted, but there&#039;s a lot to pick from I guess. And yet they highlighted a bunch of old credit cards as &quot;numismatic&quot;? Strange. </p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s their 1913 Liberty nickel. <a href="https://www.si.edu/object/5-cents-united-states-1913:nmah_835247" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.si.edu/object/5-cents-united-states-1913:nmah_835247" rel="nofollow">https://www.si.edu/object/5-cents-united-states-1913:nmah_835247</a></p><p><br /></p><p>And what? There&#039;s another one in there that I&#039;ve never seen listed as one of the five known. I guess it must be a counterfeit, but there&#039;s nothing said about it, just the images. <a href="https://www.si.edu/object/5-cents-united-states-1913:nmah_1089036" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.si.edu/object/5-cents-united-states-1913:nmah_1089036" rel="nofollow">https://www.si.edu/object/5-cents-united-states-1913:nmah_1089036</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in