NAC auction

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Okidoki, May 23, 2016.

  1. Okidoki

    Okidoki Well-Known Member

    Hi all,

    i was wondering what happens
    sale
    1e coin goes to number ....
    2e unsold
    3e coin goes to NAC

    what does 3e mean?

    cheers
    eric
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Okidoki

    Okidoki Well-Known Member

    do they bid on own sale?
     
  4. 4to2centBC

    4to2centBC Well-Known Member

    yes
     
    Okidoki likes this.
  5. Okidoki

    Okidoki Well-Known Member

  6. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    I'm sure AJ, IOM, or Volodya can answer that question accurately, but I assumed "the lot goes to NAC" means they executed a client's book bid (a bid placed prior to the auction).

    4to2 is correct though... auction houses can and do sometimes bid on their own lots for various reasons.
     
    Volodya and Okidoki like this.
  7. Okidoki

    Okidoki Well-Known Member

    to me looks like an unsold
     
  8. Okidoki

    Okidoki Well-Known Member

    this is it i think
    4. The auctioneer may raise or reject a bid without giving a reason, and furthermore reserves the right to combine or split up catalogue lots, or to offer them out of sequence or omit or withdraw them from the auction.
     
  9. AncientJoe

    AncientJoe Well-Known Member

    They (and many auction houses) represent some select clients, buy for their own stock, execute book bids, or have reserves on coins. It could be any of them depending on how the coin was consigned and how it was sold.

    For some of the flagship coins in this auction which went to NAC, I'm fairly certain it was to a few particular clients of theirs where they handle the bidding in their own sale.

    Hope that helps!
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2016
  10. Okidoki

    Okidoki Well-Known Member

    Thank you Joe,

    I was not aware this was going on, about 25-35% went to NAC i think, lot 500-600

    Best regards,
    Eric
     
  11. Volodya

    Volodya Junior Member

    TIF is almost exactly right, but it's a little trickier. "To NAC" is indeed the way Arturo Russo announces that he bought a coin on behalf of the book... but it's also the way he announces that he bought a coin for NAC's own account. It's often possible to make an educated guess what's going on on any given lot, but generally there's no way to be sure.
     
  12. Volodya

    Volodya Junior Member

    No, it definitely doesn't mean unsold. Unsold will always be called out as unsold. Swiss auction regulations require that, and a representative of the canton government is always present to enforce the regulations and arbitrate any disputes. (Disputes are very rare.)
     
  13. Okidoki

    Okidoki Well-Known Member

    Thank you Volodya,
    Not very transparent, in my opinion.
     
  14. rrdenarius

    rrdenarius non omnibus dormio Supporter

    I think NAC and other auction houses buy for some customers and for their own stock sales. I have seen some items bought by NAC in their auctions offered by Naville Numismatics, see note from NNs web page below.

    http://www.navillenumismatics.com/home-wts/
    From NN's web site:
    "Naville Numismatics Ltd., founded by Andrea Lippi and Mattia Torre, is a partner of NAC, an auction house founded in Zurich in 1988, and..."
     
    Okidoki likes this.
  15. Volodya

    Volodya Junior Member

    Addendum on a bit more reflection: In my experience, Arturo very very seldom competes with legitimate client bids, whether from the book, the floor or the Internet, even if he thinks a coin is selling too cheaply. (He may never compete with clients, but I hesitate to make quite so blanket a claim.) Almost anything NAC buys for their own inventory will otherwise have gone unsold; i.e., it will sell to NAC for the minimum 80% of estimate opening bid.
     
  16. IdesOfMarch01

    IdesOfMarch01 Well-Known Member

    This is my understanding as well.

    I would be shocked if Russo ever bid against any of his clients. While I don't know this for a fact, this might be regarded as double-dealing and NAC's reputation is worth far more than any benefit they could gain by doing this.

    On another note, I appear to have won one of the two lots on which I bid. I'm awaiting confirmation...
     
    Carthago and Okidoki like this.
  17. AncientJoe

    AncientJoe Well-Known Member

    I hope you get your confirmation soon - I always dislike the waiting period between the sale and finding out if everything was successful.

    I managed to win all six lots I was after, a personal success record, especially at NAC. Some of these coins represent significant upgrades and long-term wantlisted coins for me, so I'm elated!
     
  18. Okidoki

    Okidoki Well-Known Member

    nice to hear guys,
    please share your winners. here :D
     
    AncientJoe likes this.
  19. Volodya

    Volodya Junior Member

    My only winner today was lot 435 (other than lot 259, an inexpensive lot early in the RR section I bid on to make sure there were no glitches with online bidding. I didn't expect to win! but at 275 CHF I can live with it. It's interesting.) 435 was the coin I most wanted (and could realistically afford), so I'm pleased. I would've gone quite a bit higher. Lot 435, Clodius Vestalis:

    [​IMG]
     
    Edessa, PeteB, Pishpash and 16 others like this.
  20. Okidoki

    Okidoki Well-Known Member

    Stunning, never seen it, thank you for sharing volodya
     
    Volodya likes this.
  21. Carthago

    Carthago Does this look infected to you?

    Nice coin big V!! Had my eye on that one myself. :cyclops:

    I had a great auction. Bought 7, old collection coins. My favorite of the bunch that I couldn't live without (and fortunately won't have to) is a denarius of Sextus Pompey.
    Sextus Pompeius. Denarius, Sicily 37-36, AR 3.86 g. MAG·PIVS·IMP·ITER Head of Cn. Pompeius Magnus r.; behind jug and before, lituus. Rev. PRÆF Neptune standing l., foot on prow, between the brothers Anapias and Amphinomus, with their parents on their shoulders; in exergue, CLAS·E.T·ORÆ / MARIT·EX·S·C. Babelon Pompeia 27. C 17. Sydenham 1344. Sear Imperators 334. Woytek, Arma et Nummi p. 558. RBW 1785. Crawford 511/3a.

    2295972l.jpg
     
    Edessa, akeady, PeteB and 16 others like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page