Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Mystery Copper (George III?)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Coinsandmedals, post: 3878647, member: 107435"]Something has been bothering me about this piece since I first responded. I’ve scanned through thousands of copper and bronze pieces from this era throughout my collecting efforts, and the crude design paired with the “counterstamp” seem so familiar to me, but I can’t place it. In my cursory glance, I didn’t notice the remnants of “NEA” on the back. I wonder if this could be a counterweight for a Guinea. This theory, of course, would be highly contingent upon the weight and diameter of your piece. If it were a Guinea weight, I believe it would need to weigh 8.4 grams and have a diameter of about 24 mm (larger than a U.S. small cent at 19.05 mm). The diameter would be much less important than the weight as these would have been used on a balance scale. The crown “counterstamp” would also make sense as these were often given official (looking?) marks so that they could be used in commerce. Look this item number up on eBay for a 1/2 Guinea example and let me know what you think (303367703812). This is but removed from my general area, so feel free to dismiss my opinion completely.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Coinsandmedals, post: 3878647, member: 107435"]Something has been bothering me about this piece since I first responded. I’ve scanned through thousands of copper and bronze pieces from this era throughout my collecting efforts, and the crude design paired with the “counterstamp” seem so familiar to me, but I can’t place it. In my cursory glance, I didn’t notice the remnants of “NEA” on the back. I wonder if this could be a counterweight for a Guinea. This theory, of course, would be highly contingent upon the weight and diameter of your piece. If it were a Guinea weight, I believe it would need to weigh 8.4 grams and have a diameter of about 24 mm (larger than a U.S. small cent at 19.05 mm). The diameter would be much less important than the weight as these would have been used on a balance scale. The crown “counterstamp” would also make sense as these were often given official (looking?) marks so that they could be used in commerce. Look this item number up on eBay for a 1/2 Guinea example and let me know what you think (303367703812). This is but removed from my general area, so feel free to dismiss my opinion completely.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Mystery Copper (George III?)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...