Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Michael Grell, post: 782751, member: 22612"]No i think its far from this era and ruler. The perfection of the coins you show dont match the one i posess, nor does any detail, especially the mineral. The coins you displayed shows an advanced coinknowledge, perfect dimensions, other materials, not really similar motives, and im sure not the same cointhickness. This coin im trying to understand has a thickness of 6-7 mm. I have been seeking a place that can C14 date it, that would show more facts. Havent found a place for that so far though. This is not of that ruler, it think we need to look on other empires for a better match. Unless likely few hundred years before the ones you shown me. This coin is a clumsy creation, thick, not evenly round, but not oval nor square. Sloppy print. If you would touch it in your hand you would think of stone, polished stone. So it has to have been in shallow vibrant water for a long long time, like a beach. But unseen till modern time. Dont have to be an old coin, but it can also be the worls oldest one. And the only thing i say this for is the motive of the mammoth. It really is a mammoth, i have analyzed it in over ten ways, i see its true structure and aswell you do if you see it for real. But who would know of the mammoths, and was they around way longer than said today, thats a clue perhaps to seek in historical documents.[/QUOTE]