Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
My top 10 Women of Rome acquisitions for 2019
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="lrbguy, post: 3976409, member: 88829"]I still have a few December additions that have not yet arrived, so my 2019 top ten will be a true year in review. I can now post the items I most enjoyed getting this past year, but I will do it in two thematic groups. The group of coins in this post are my top favorite acquisitions for my Women of Rome collection in silver. Saying that is a bit ironic inasmuch as one here is a Greek coin and one is a Roman Provincial bronze. What can I say, they had to fit in somewhere. Since each coin has its own intrigue I can’t say I favor one much over another, so the coins for the Roman Imperial women will be arranged chronologically by when they were on the throne. First, however let me dispense with the Greek addition.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1046633[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>ATTICA, Athens</b></p><p>c. 454-404 BCE</p><p><br /></p><p>Back in May when TIF posted <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/whats-the-secret-handshake-another-new-owl-tet-club-member.339458/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/whats-the-secret-handshake-another-new-owl-tet-club-member.339458/">her recently acquired Attic Tetradrachm, </a>she made the point that a large number of these are presently on the market so that prices for nice examples would be down for a while. I had been procrastinating about upgrading my example for years, but decided that now would be a good time to do something about it. Since I had no intention of shooting for top of the line, her example looked about right. Since many have been encased by NGC, I decided to shoot for something akin to the 5/5 strike, and 3/5 surfaces benchmarks she had found. This one came along and I decided to go for it. It’s still entombed in plastic (see the white marks?) because I don’t trust myself to break the case without scratching the coin. I have looked at some of the radical solutions proposed here, and so far it’s “no thanks.” I wanted an example that showed the full crest, but was a bit stumped by the blank spot on the flan above the helmet. That got settled when a splendid full crest example popped up here and I was able to see clearly that my blank spot is a slight mistrike in which the feathering is not fully struck. Too bad. But it is still a nice strike, and I’m satisfied. All said, it was not my most expensive coin for this year.</p><p><br /></p><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><p>Top Ten Women of Rome Acquisitions for 2019</p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Manlia Scantilla</p><p><br /></p><p>First up is a denarius for the wife of Didius Julianus. I had acquired a coin for her daughter Didia Clara last year, and found a budget example for mama this year in a sale by CNG. It looked pretty grungy and still cost over a grand, but usually the coins at CNG have good integrity, so I decided to take the plunge. I thought that if it was sound I might be able to clean it up a bit.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1046635[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>After a couple of hours with the microscope and needle it seems well on the road to recovery (see below). </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1046636[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>If you are going to take a steel needle to a costly coin, you have to make sure you are not going to alter the surfaces. Unfortunately for me some previous owner did some very spotty smoothing (and roughing) in places, probably to fix up some cleaning problems. I did not attempt to alter those spots, but made sure I did not add to them. My work was confined to the black accretions of hardened soil deposits, and they have been responding quite well. Despite the earlier mangle I am very pleased that the coin has retained so much of its original integrity. The portrait is liberating very nicely, I think. It has a ways to go, but I don’t foresee any real problems.</p><p><br /></p><p>Julia Maesa</p><p><br /></p><p>The next coin is an early example of the use of the ascending peacock apotheosis on a CONSECRATIO denarius of Julia Maesa. Her denarii are generally quite common, but this consecration issue is a bit on the rare side. It seems to be the earliest use of this ascending bird reverse type I have seen. Prior to this the peacock (or also an eagle) is standing in various poses, including the one on the very rare antoninianus of Maesa’s sister, Julia Domna. I was happy to add it, although it came in a tomb (how appropriate), and is still in it until I can be sure I can release it without damage (hence the white spots in the photos).</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1046637[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Egnatia Mariniana</p><p><br /></p><p>(For the sake of the reverse type I will present this next coin out of chronological sequence)</p><p><br /></p><p>The wife of Valerian I, and presumably mother of Gallienus (contra Temeryazev and Makarenko), died in 253 just as her husband was coming to the throne. All of her coinage is posthumous in two principal CONSECRATIO types, with peacock standing or ascending. Among the latter she is most commonly seen mounted facing to the left and the bird ascends facing to the right (see the Maesa example above). However, a listed variant of this type has the two figures reversed from those positions. It was very satisfying to be able to add an example of this variant to the collection in 2019.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1046638[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Herrenia Etruscilla</p><p><br /></p><p>The antoniniani from the mint at Rome for the wife of Trajan Decius are quite plentiful, particularly those with the Pudicitia reverse type. Her coins from the eastern mint (most probably Antioch) are another matter entirely. These feature reverse types not regularly used at Rome at this time. Today the eastern coinage is seldom seen, so I was delighted to find this example from a reputable seller on eBay. One of the key “tells” for the eastern mint issues is the presence of dots below the obverse bust, as you see here.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1046639[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Cornelia Supera</p><p><br /></p><p>This empress is only known to history through her coinage which seems to connect her to the emperor Aemilian. All of her imperial coinage is in silver (except for a highly dubious sestertius with an Otacilia Severa reverse) and is of such rarity as to be hopelessly out of reach for me. Thanks to the kindness of list member [USER=98035]@Finn235[/USER] he alerted me to a reasonable Roman Provincial which I was only too happy to add to the pile. It’s not much of a looker, and even this was not cheap, but it is certainly better than what I had for her before (which was nothing).</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1046640[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Pause to reload:[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="lrbguy, post: 3976409, member: 88829"]I still have a few December additions that have not yet arrived, so my 2019 top ten will be a true year in review. I can now post the items I most enjoyed getting this past year, but I will do it in two thematic groups. The group of coins in this post are my top favorite acquisitions for my Women of Rome collection in silver. Saying that is a bit ironic inasmuch as one here is a Greek coin and one is a Roman Provincial bronze. What can I say, they had to fit in somewhere. Since each coin has its own intrigue I can’t say I favor one much over another, so the coins for the Roman Imperial women will be arranged chronologically by when they were on the throne. First, however let me dispense with the Greek addition. [ATTACH=full]1046633[/ATTACH] [B]ATTICA, Athens[/B] c. 454-404 BCE Back in May when TIF posted [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/threads/whats-the-secret-handshake-another-new-owl-tet-club-member.339458/']her recently acquired Attic Tetradrachm, [/URL]she made the point that a large number of these are presently on the market so that prices for nice examples would be down for a while. I had been procrastinating about upgrading my example for years, but decided that now would be a good time to do something about it. Since I had no intention of shooting for top of the line, her example looked about right. Since many have been encased by NGC, I decided to shoot for something akin to the 5/5 strike, and 3/5 surfaces benchmarks she had found. This one came along and I decided to go for it. It’s still entombed in plastic (see the white marks?) because I don’t trust myself to break the case without scratching the coin. I have looked at some of the radical solutions proposed here, and so far it’s “no thanks.” I wanted an example that showed the full crest, but was a bit stumped by the blank spot on the flan above the helmet. That got settled when a splendid full crest example popped up here and I was able to see clearly that my blank spot is a slight mistrike in which the feathering is not fully struck. Too bad. But it is still a nice strike, and I’m satisfied. All said, it was not my most expensive coin for this year. [INDENT][INDENT][INDENT][INDENT][INDENT]Top Ten Women of Rome Acquisitions for 2019[/INDENT][/INDENT][/INDENT][/INDENT][/INDENT] Manlia Scantilla First up is a denarius for the wife of Didius Julianus. I had acquired a coin for her daughter Didia Clara last year, and found a budget example for mama this year in a sale by CNG. It looked pretty grungy and still cost over a grand, but usually the coins at CNG have good integrity, so I decided to take the plunge. I thought that if it was sound I might be able to clean it up a bit. [ATTACH=full]1046635[/ATTACH] After a couple of hours with the microscope and needle it seems well on the road to recovery (see below). [ATTACH=full]1046636[/ATTACH] If you are going to take a steel needle to a costly coin, you have to make sure you are not going to alter the surfaces. Unfortunately for me some previous owner did some very spotty smoothing (and roughing) in places, probably to fix up some cleaning problems. I did not attempt to alter those spots, but made sure I did not add to them. My work was confined to the black accretions of hardened soil deposits, and they have been responding quite well. Despite the earlier mangle I am very pleased that the coin has retained so much of its original integrity. The portrait is liberating very nicely, I think. It has a ways to go, but I don’t foresee any real problems. Julia Maesa The next coin is an early example of the use of the ascending peacock apotheosis on a CONSECRATIO denarius of Julia Maesa. Her denarii are generally quite common, but this consecration issue is a bit on the rare side. It seems to be the earliest use of this ascending bird reverse type I have seen. Prior to this the peacock (or also an eagle) is standing in various poses, including the one on the very rare antoninianus of Maesa’s sister, Julia Domna. I was happy to add it, although it came in a tomb (how appropriate), and is still in it until I can be sure I can release it without damage (hence the white spots in the photos). [ATTACH=full]1046637[/ATTACH] Egnatia Mariniana (For the sake of the reverse type I will present this next coin out of chronological sequence) The wife of Valerian I, and presumably mother of Gallienus (contra Temeryazev and Makarenko), died in 253 just as her husband was coming to the throne. All of her coinage is posthumous in two principal CONSECRATIO types, with peacock standing or ascending. Among the latter she is most commonly seen mounted facing to the left and the bird ascends facing to the right (see the Maesa example above). However, a listed variant of this type has the two figures reversed from those positions. It was very satisfying to be able to add an example of this variant to the collection in 2019. [ATTACH=full]1046638[/ATTACH] Herrenia Etruscilla The antoniniani from the mint at Rome for the wife of Trajan Decius are quite plentiful, particularly those with the Pudicitia reverse type. Her coins from the eastern mint (most probably Antioch) are another matter entirely. These feature reverse types not regularly used at Rome at this time. Today the eastern coinage is seldom seen, so I was delighted to find this example from a reputable seller on eBay. One of the key “tells” for the eastern mint issues is the presence of dots below the obverse bust, as you see here. [ATTACH=full]1046639[/ATTACH] Cornelia Supera This empress is only known to history through her coinage which seems to connect her to the emperor Aemilian. All of her imperial coinage is in silver (except for a highly dubious sestertius with an Otacilia Severa reverse) and is of such rarity as to be hopelessly out of reach for me. Thanks to the kindness of list member [USER=98035]@Finn235[/USER] he alerted me to a reasonable Roman Provincial which I was only too happy to add to the pile. It’s not much of a looker, and even this was not cheap, but it is certainly better than what I had for her before (which was nothing). [ATTACH=full]1046640[/ATTACH] Pause to reload:[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
My top 10 Women of Rome acquisitions for 2019
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...