Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
My newest FTR Hut
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="maridvnvm, post: 2829520, member: 31620"]I keep adding FTR coins to the hoard and every now and then come across something that I find interesting enough to share.</p><p><br /></p><p>This one is an example where I have held off a little from posting it to discuss it offline first to see what people far more experienced with these than I think.</p><p><br /></p><p>This one poses lots of questions but I don't have many answers. I will start with my description of the coin and an image. Then on to the questions and some thoughts already received.</p><p><br /></p><p>Constans AE2</p><p>Obv:- D N CONSTANS P F AVG, Pearl diademed, draped & cuirassed bust right; N behind bust</p><p>Rev:- FEL TEMP-REPARATIO, Helmeted soldier, spear in left hand, advancing right, head left; with his right hand he leads a small bare-headed figure from a hut beneath a tree. The spear points downwards to the left</p><p>Mintmarks _ | N//TR</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]666610[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Now the puzzles:-</p><p><br /></p><p>It has N on both sides, which is quite common from Rome and Rare from Aquileia on very late issues but not noted for other mints.</p><p><br /></p><p>The exe appears to be TR. This would indicate Trier but TR alone is not a listed mintmark but would be consistent with a later issue.</p><p><br /></p><p>The tree is consistent with the type ONLY used in Trier and doesn't appear to be known from any other mint.</p><p><br /></p><p>The portrait style looks like Trier to my eye but perhaps that is me being wishful.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have discussed it with Bill Welch and he agrees that almost every stylistic aspect (portrait, hut, captive, tree, soldier) is consistent with Trier. The arm being grasped is a bit ms-shapen, which is odd. The TR mark is not know. In my experience, Trier did not produce the sort of oddities I have seen from Siscia. Even though the style is good enough to have been made by a mint worker, Bill would not want to say this this is an official issue. </p><p><br /></p><p>I have asked Doug and Randy and welcome them to express their opinions here.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think it is a late, unlisted, official issue because of the superb style across all these facets.</p><p><br /></p><p>I do have the normal huts from Trier for Constans and Constantius which are relatively tricky to come by.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10618/RI_169am_img.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><img src="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10618/RI_170ec_img.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>A puzzle. At least for now.</p><p><br /></p><p>Martin[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="maridvnvm, post: 2829520, member: 31620"]I keep adding FTR coins to the hoard and every now and then come across something that I find interesting enough to share. This one is an example where I have held off a little from posting it to discuss it offline first to see what people far more experienced with these than I think. This one poses lots of questions but I don't have many answers. I will start with my description of the coin and an image. Then on to the questions and some thoughts already received. Constans AE2 Obv:- D N CONSTANS P F AVG, Pearl diademed, draped & cuirassed bust right; N behind bust Rev:- FEL TEMP-REPARATIO, Helmeted soldier, spear in left hand, advancing right, head left; with his right hand he leads a small bare-headed figure from a hut beneath a tree. The spear points downwards to the left Mintmarks _ | N//TR [ATTACH=full]666610[/ATTACH] Now the puzzles:- It has N on both sides, which is quite common from Rome and Rare from Aquileia on very late issues but not noted for other mints. The exe appears to be TR. This would indicate Trier but TR alone is not a listed mintmark but would be consistent with a later issue. The tree is consistent with the type ONLY used in Trier and doesn't appear to be known from any other mint. The portrait style looks like Trier to my eye but perhaps that is me being wishful. I have discussed it with Bill Welch and he agrees that almost every stylistic aspect (portrait, hut, captive, tree, soldier) is consistent with Trier. The arm being grasped is a bit ms-shapen, which is odd. The TR mark is not know. In my experience, Trier did not produce the sort of oddities I have seen from Siscia. Even though the style is good enough to have been made by a mint worker, Bill would not want to say this this is an official issue. I have asked Doug and Randy and welcome them to express their opinions here. I think it is a late, unlisted, official issue because of the superb style across all these facets. I do have the normal huts from Trier for Constans and Constantius which are relatively tricky to come by. [IMG]http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10618/RI_169am_img.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10618/RI_170ec_img.jpg[/IMG] A puzzle. At least for now. Martin[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
My newest FTR Hut
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...