Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2152570, member: 28107"]... Yet you make the same errors in this thread again?  You stated that "any" (as in you can pick any one of the coins; or, put another way all of them) have "done very well."  This is not the case.  Moreover, you now state that you were in fact not counting all the coins; thus, it is false to make broad pronouncements that all of them have done well because you did not address all of them.  You did not qualify your statements.  As written, the statements were incorrect.  And even with clarifications, (you allow for silver) you are still incorrect.  All silver coins with that mintage have not done very well.  All coins issued as part of a series have not done very well. The 5 oz. pucks were made of silver, were struck along copper-nickel ATB coin, carried the same face value of $0.25, had mintages below 100,000, and are just as much part of the ATB quarter series as this new dime is to the Roosevelt series.  These pieces have depreciated.   Even if you believe this is "doing well" compared to the rest of the bullion market as you contended previously, it is absurd at best to state that these have "done very well."  It appears you have now become even more extreme in your position. Accuracy and clarity are important in writing.  If someone took your comments at face value, you would have misled them and possibly caused someone to speculate to their detriment.  If people are going to speculate, they should do so based on the actual facts and not a selective gloss. I truly hope these do well for everyone purchasing one, but for the love of money, please get your facts straight and stop creating artificial hype. Anyway, this is my last post to this thread on this topic.  Let us not derail the OP's thread.  You can PM any further debate although I probably won't respond anymore as I merely beating a dead horse.[/QUOTE]

Create my FREE Account!

Log in or Sign up

Reply to Thread

Useful Searches