There were some that were struck extra times to overcome deficiencies of the rim. That can result in "ghosting" of the "1964" date digits.
I Like the ghosting. It creates a VAM effect amongst your Morgan restrikes--a definite unique quality right there. Definitely approve, and eagerly waiting for my '64 D restrike.
You are going to start a firestorm with that one lol! I would doubt it because they did produce 1921 morgans.
El Cheapo is great but geeze. Leave the man alone. If you don't like don't buy. A few common date Morgan's over struck certainly isn't going to effect you or the hobby. Let the OP and other purchasers' enjoy.
How exactly did my comment give you the impression that was harassing Dan? And yes, destroying common date collectible Morgans does affect the hobby, IMO.
Destroying common date collectible Morgans? Sounds like a dig to me. I have a BU 21 Morgan bought about 40 years ago for like 3-5 bucks. A dealer will still offer me right around melt for it. So how is an over strike of a common date hurting the hobby? What are we talking about, a few hundred coins at most that will end up in the melting pot if silver soars or coins that a dealer will not pay much above melt for if offered for sale to them.
If your dealer only wants to pay melt for a BU 1921, then you need a new dealer. $14? What a great guy!
Actually my dealer is good....I was talking in general. Sells me junk silver at or below melt when I purchase. Of course one hand always washes the other & I have sold him hot mint issues at mint cost more then once. I am in my 50's and have been going there since I was 14, 15?
You're argument is flawed CBD. Do yourself a favor and grab some high quality DC Morgans at issue price of $115 while you can. You can flip them right now for over $225-300 on the bay
I guess this is a fair analogy. For the longest time I didn't understand paying huge money for P-01 coins. Just like I didn't understand paying $450 for a 1964-D Dan Carr token.