Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;DonnaML, post: 8253945, member: 110350&quot;]I am not qualified to judge, but the apparent presence of the dot under the &quot;L&quot; --which I can barely see, but I&#039;ll take your word for it that it&#039;s there&nbsp; -- in the same location as those fakes would certainly raise questions for me. [USER=79368]@Barry Murphy[/USER], do you have an opinion? Do you see anything problematic about my own new Valentinian I solidus (see <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/a-new-solidus-valentinian-i.394127/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/a-new-solidus-valentinian-i.394127/">https://www.cointalk.com/threads/a-new-solidus-valentinian-i.394127/</a>) -- which definitely doesn&#039;t have that dot? Just because there are a number of fake Valentinian I solidi from the Antioch mint doesn&#039;t mean that they&#039;re all fake. In fact, it wouldn&#039;t surprise me if forgers have chosen that emperor and mint to counterfeit for the very reason that they&#039;re so common, and there are so many different genuine varieties.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in