My Latest Coin

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Romancollector, Sep 23, 2019.

  1. Romancollector

    Romancollector Well-Known Member

    Hi everyone,

    Just thought I'd share my latest acquisition.

    At the moment, I'm on bit of a late antique streak....
    Valentinian I (364-375)
    AV Solidus
    Mint: Antioch
    RIX IX 202b


    Valentinian I solidus.png
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

  4. Mat

    Mat Ancient Coincoholic

    Lucky, can never go wrong with gold.

    [​IMG]
    Valentinian I (364 - 375 A.D.)
    Æ3
    O:DN VALENTINIANVS PF AVG diademed, draped & cuirassed bust right.
    R: RESTITVTOR REIP, Valentinian standing front, head right, holding Victory and standard with X on banner. Mintmark SMKB
    20mm
    3.38g
    Cyzicus
    RIC 10a, B
     
  5. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    ..very nice RC...you're goin' the way of da Panzerman eh?! ;)
     
    Romancollector likes this.
  6. Romancollector

    Romancollector Well-Known Member

    @ominus1 based on what I have seen I hope so.... :woot:
     
    ominus1 likes this.
  7. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    Unfortunately the Valentinian solidus is a modern forgery.

    Barry Murphy.
     
  8. Romancollector

    Romancollector Well-Known Member

    Hi @Barry Murphy ,

    What makes it a modern forgery. I purchased from an extremely reputable dealer?
     
  9. Romancollector

    Romancollector Well-Known Member

    @Barry Murphy this is the image from wildwinds, I don't see any incriminating discrepancies. Is it the texture of the coin or something else that is a give away?
    Please let me know
    [​IMG]
     
  10. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    Fabric is wrong, luster is wrong for a high grade coin, line above the legend on the right is wrong, weight is a full gram light.

    Barry Murphy.
     
    Broucheion likes this.
  11. Romancollector

    Romancollector Well-Known Member

    Hi @Barry Murphy my lighting is not the best, and the colour of the coin is comparable to all other solidi that I own. Also, I did not list the weight of the coin so I'm not quite sure how you deduced that, and if you are referring to the line above ANTS (if that is the one you are referring to) it looks fairly similar to the wildwinds photo.
     
  12. Ryro

    Ryro Trying to remove supporter status

    Oh man, that's not gonna confuse me:facepalm: Roman collector and Romancollector:wacky:
    Nice gold btw:jawdrop: I have none.:yawn:
    But I do have plenty of bronze!
    64378803-7D94-4CA9-9FEB-EFB59F625977.png
    Valentinian I
    364-375 CE Æ Siscia, 367-375. Pearl-diademed, draped and cuirassed bust r. R/ Emperor advancing r., head l., dragging bound captive and holding labarum; M-star/F//BSISCS. RIC IX 14a.xvi.
     
  13. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    B21B5A7A-908F-4318-9E86-6206BB1B846C.jpeg BB3ABB99-B044-4DDA-AC57-7319565993E8.jpeg The Wildwinds coin came from a UBS sale in 2006. It was the host coin for this fake and a number of others that have appeared since.

    The fakes have a small pellet in the field below the L in VAlentinian that’s not in the original.

    These are ex heritage and ex nomos.
     
  14. Romancollector

    Romancollector Well-Known Member

    @Barry Murphy I should add that the coin is 4.4 grams (the average seems to be 4.5 grams so it is only 0.1 grams lighter). I just weighed it right now.

    Could the pellet just be the result of a die match? In general, I have seen many ancients with the same die, all from reputable dealers/auction houses.

    I am somewhat of a novice.

    Thanks for the input.
     
    7Calbrey likes this.
  15. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    ..oh, i'm sorry @Romancollector:( (don't feel bad, it happens to the best, me included) ..i wouldn't dispute the word of Barry Murphy on any coin for his word is gold here (no pun intended) we are fortunate to have his input here....hopefully you can return and get a refund...and yeah @Ryro, i am guilty of that very thing too:eggface: ...have to watch that ( Roman Collector is RC and Romancollector shall be Rc henceforth and forever :singing:...till further notice :p)..my apologies to @Roman Collector and @Romancollector respectively...:)
     
  16. RichardT

    RichardT Well-Known Member

    I'm sorry to hear about this. It would have fooled me as well. Barry is very experienced in such matters so if he thinks it's a fake you can probably trust him on it.

    It appears to be a transfer die fake which aren't easy to detect.
     
    Multatuli and ominus1 like this.
  17. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    Sorry about the mistake on the weight. I read the weight on the other coin and got confused.
     
    ominus1 likes this.
  18. Suarez

    Suarez Well-Known Member

  19. Mat

    Mat Ancient Coincoholic

    Sucks it’s a fake, partly why I don’t buy ancient gold, and cost.
     
  20. Romancollector

    Romancollector Well-Known Member

    @Mat ....It sure does :dead: too bad gold is my favourite category of ancients... maybe I'll stick to NGC certified from now on to have some peace of mind.
     
    7Calbrey and paschka like this.
  21. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    Well, if it's any consolation @Roman Collector, it most certainly would have fooled me as well.
     
    paschka, Romancollector and Andres2 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page