Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 2027370, member: 15309&quot;]Okay, here are my grades:</p><p><br /></p><p>1939-D:&nbsp; NGC MS67, PCGS MS66+&nbsp; Nice coin, very clean</p><p>1939-S:&nbsp; NGC MS65 PCGS MS64&nbsp; Weak strike, very baggy, nice luster &amp; eye appeal</p><p>1940:&nbsp; NGC MS66, PCGS MS65/66 FS (explained in other thread)</p><p>1941-D:&nbsp; NGC MS66+, PCGS MS66 (explained in other thread)</p><p>1942-D:&nbsp; NGC MS67, PCGS MS66+&nbsp; Clean surfaces, nice luster, nice color.</p><p>1942:&nbsp; MS64/65 I wouldn&#039;t send this one</p><p>1944-D:&nbsp; NGC MS66, PCGS MS65 FS Pretty common either way</p><p>1945-S:&nbsp; NGC MS66 (maybe), PCGS MS65 TPGs are tough on war nickels.</p><p>1946:&nbsp; MS64/65&nbsp; Weak strike, strange color</p><p>1949:&nbsp; NGC MS66+ (possible *), PCGS MS66&nbsp; This is tough date and your coin has great color.&nbsp; The chatter on the cheek and jaw is remnant planchet roughness and will be ignored by the graders.&nbsp; The luster worries me a little but if you get this in an NGC MS66* holder you will make some money.</p><p>1956-D:&nbsp; NGC MS66, PCGS MS65/66&nbsp; Coin is pretty clean but there is severe die wear and some scattered marks.</p><p><br /></p><p>I really like the 39-D and the 49.&nbsp; I also like the 42-D, but I wish it had full steps.&nbsp; The war nickels are nice but nothing special and because they are so common, both TPGs hold them to a higher standard.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in