Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Alegandron, post: 4238477, member: 51347&quot;]Congrats, [USER=85912]@Coinprinces[/USER] ... that is a great example!</p><p><br /></p><p>Mine are a more humble variety</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/ri-valentinian-iii-425-455-ce-ae-9mm-rome-mint-jpg.1031037/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p>RI Valentinian III 425-455 CE AE 9mm Rome mint</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/upload_2019-12-1_15-19-21-png.1031044/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><b>VALENTINIAN III AE4 11mm 1.47g Nummus (VF)</b></p><p>AV: DN VALENTINIAN PF AVG; pearl-diademed draped cuirassed bust r.</p><p>REV: SALVS REI - PVBL[]; Victory advancing left holding weath and palm.</p><p>EXE: [RM] Rome mint.</p><p>REF: RIC X Rome 2108, Scarce, <b>425-430AD.</b></p><p>Apparently the first substantive issue for Valentinian III which would suggest an early date. The reverse legend is highly abbreviated REI - PVBL[] instead of the longer REIPVBLICE, as the small flan couldn&#039;t account for a full legend. This is very usual for the type and the age.</p><p>Ex. G &amp; N Numismatik, DE[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in