Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Heliodromus, post: 7876420, member: 120820&quot;]I assume he was dead, or as good as! Maxentius seems to have initially hoped that Galerius (who was his father-in-law after all) might have OK&#039;d his power grab as he did Constantine&#039;s, so he would initially have had no reason to exclude either. By the time Maxentius issued this type (RIC 50-51), with Constantine now included, it seems Severus II&#039;s failed attempt to oust him had probably occured, and Galerius therefore also excluded.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Galerius CAES was part of the 1st tetrarchy (RIC 33-34), when all was well and Carthage was under control of Maximianus.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have a bit more verbose description of the lineup changes on this FORVM NumisWiki page, which was based on a post over there that I prepared the graphic for.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=SALVIS%20AVGG%20ET%20CAESS%20FEL%20KART" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=SALVIS%20AVGG%20ET%20CAESS%20FEL%20KART" rel="nofollow">https://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=SALVIS AVGG ET CAESS FEL KART</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in