Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
My Beef with Grading Companys....
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="imrich, post: 950678, member: 22331"]<b>Apparent Inability To Communicate</b></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p> <font face="Arial Black">To minimize degradation of this thread, I will respond in brevity, and entertain additional submission/response by P.M.</font></p><p><font face="Arial Black">1. My post isn't in "bold", but merely in "arial black" font, which darkens/spreads characters for ease of reading.</font></p><p><font face="Arial Black">2. I believe your post mistated my "words of record", which I deem unacceptable.</font></p><p><font face="Arial Black">3. I merely took exception to your post which I believe incorrectly inferred that medoraman had stated an inability to recognize grade differences, but your infallibility allowed distinguishment and acceptance of significant add. pricing.</font></p><p><font face="Arial Black">4. Empirical data is specified as that from differing grading upon resubmission, and receipt of holders incorrectly identifying coin type enclosed.</font></p><p><font face="Arial Black">5. I believe we understand the wager process without stated "odds", to whatever amount a responder would care to lose.</font></p><p><font face="Arial Black">6. I must have missed a portion of the GD posts, as you've cited information, of which I find no thread posting. It isn't the first time I may have erred!!</font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="imrich, post: 950678, member: 22331"][b]Apparent Inability To Communicate[/b] [FONT=Arial Black]To minimize degradation of this thread, I will respond in brevity, and entertain additional submission/response by P.M. 1. My post isn't in "bold", but merely in "arial black" font, which darkens/spreads characters for ease of reading. 2. I believe your post mistated my "words of record", which I deem unacceptable. 3. I merely took exception to your post which I believe incorrectly inferred that medoraman had stated an inability to recognize grade differences, but your infallibility allowed distinguishment and acceptance of significant add. pricing. 4. Empirical data is specified as that from differing grading upon resubmission, and receipt of holders incorrectly identifying coin type enclosed. 5. I believe we understand the wager process without stated "odds", to whatever amount a responder would care to lose. 6. I must have missed a portion of the GD posts, as you've cited information, of which I find no thread posting. It isn't the first time I may have erred!![/FONT][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
My Beef with Grading Companys....
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...