Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
My Beef with Grading Companys....
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="imrich, post: 950296, member: 22331"]<b>Failure To Communicate</b></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p> Since it appears that bold letters makes it impossible for some to understand what is written, I will respond in a like font. If you "convert" my post to your desired font, and read same with another it will be determined that I never mentioned dollars other than to show that a single grade disparity in a MS65 common date Double Eagle is quite appreciable (enough to purchase 100 MS63 Morgan Dollars, which was being used as the standard for disparity of worth). I can't quite determine where you imagined that I stated "that there is no difference between and MS63 and MS65 Morgan Dollars". I posted "<font face="Arial Black"><font face="Georgia">I was about to do the same, showing grading incongruities by posting</font> AU58 <u>to</u> MS65 "common date" St. Gaudens Double Eagles,<font face="Georgia"> as I've previously posted on this site."</font> </font>I've personally found the Morgan Dollar grading to be more difficult grading than Double Eagles, and in a study of TPG have used a coin which has more universally recognized grading criteria. The value of a <font face="Arial Black">Double Eagle</font> error is probably more monetarily significant than other coins. Empirical data from past random resubmissions has shown that the top tier TPG are very inconsistent, specimens "in hand" indicating that they can hardly determine attributes, much less consistently grade, thus plus grading, and secondary certification. In my opinion, "Top Tier" TPG have already established their inconsistencies, hardly ones to correctly ask for regrading of their past efforts. My offer to wager a large sum is open to all critics of my process, especially those who are espoused to be the ultimate authorities for grading. The post challenge by GD will ascertain your personal grading capabilities relative to the "PROS", of which when shown to be undoubtedly correct, I will be very admirable/respectful, showing my failure to recognize a Morgan Dollar grading authority, for which I will express humility.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="imrich, post: 950296, member: 22331"][b]Failure To Communicate[/b] Since it appears that bold letters makes it impossible for some to understand what is written, I will respond in a like font. If you "convert" my post to your desired font, and read same with another it will be determined that I never mentioned dollars other than to show that a single grade disparity in a MS65 common date Double Eagle is quite appreciable (enough to purchase 100 MS63 Morgan Dollars, which was being used as the standard for disparity of worth). I can't quite determine where you imagined that I stated "that there is no difference between and MS63 and MS65 Morgan Dollars". I posted "[FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Georgia]I was about to do the same, showing grading incongruities by posting[/FONT] AU58 [U]to[/U] MS65 "common date" St. Gaudens Double Eagles,[FONT=Georgia] as I've previously posted on this site."[/FONT] [/FONT]I've personally found the Morgan Dollar grading to be more difficult grading than Double Eagles, and in a study of TPG have used a coin which has more universally recognized grading criteria. The value of a [FONT=Arial Black]Double Eagle[/FONT] error is probably more monetarily significant than other coins. Empirical data from past random resubmissions has shown that the top tier TPG are very inconsistent, specimens "in hand" indicating that they can hardly determine attributes, much less consistently grade, thus plus grading, and secondary certification. In my opinion, "Top Tier" TPG have already established their inconsistencies, hardly ones to correctly ask for regrading of their past efforts. My offer to wager a large sum is open to all critics of my process, especially those who are espoused to be the ultimate authorities for grading. The post challenge by GD will ascertain your personal grading capabilities relative to the "PROS", of which when shown to be undoubtedly correct, I will be very admirable/respectful, showing my failure to recognize a Morgan Dollar grading authority, for which I will express humility.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
My Beef with Grading Companys....
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...