Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 5130601, member: 19463&quot;]Perhaps I do not understand the software that is used to combine all those images into one.&nbsp; JPG&#039;s only degrade noticeably when they are resaved. If it uploads all the images at once and does all the work spitting out a single image, there would be only one generation used and one round of degradation suffered.&nbsp; If, however, the process produces sub-stacks and saves them as JPG&#039;s, it would seem better to convert. I can not imagine a program like that saving intermediates along the way in a lossy manner unless it were required to run in a limited amount of memory.&nbsp; Since we are already dealing with overkill to the point that we never would make a practical use of the image, the reason to ask this question is back to the big one:&nbsp; We want to know.&nbsp; The obvious answer is to try one both ways and see what you see.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in