Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
My Aes Rude - or Am I Rude?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="rrdenarius, post: 2284190, member: 75525"]A little bit better description of the pieces above. I did not see exact matches of any of the Ramo Seco pieces in Thurlow & Vecchi or Vecchi. I will need some time to look at the copies of Aes Grave, E J Haeberlin and Le Monete dell’Italia antica, Raffaele Garrucci to see if I can find a better match for the RS pieces. Both books are available for free download, see my blog for RR references.</p><p><br /></p><p># - description</p><p><br /></p><p>1. Aes formatum. Lot of three fragments, late 4th-early 3rd century BC. AE. g. 48.61; g. 22.25; g. 12.03. </p><p><br /></p><p>a. 11.2 thick X 38.0 wide X 31.55 long. Looks like the end piece of a bar with rounded ends. Thinner at edge. One unbroken and two broken edges.</p><p><br /></p><p>b. 9.1 thick X 33.2 X 18.8; edge piece of a bar, thin at edge & thicker away from edge. One unbroken, straight edge and two broken edges.</p><p><br /></p><p>c. 6.4 thick X 21.0 X 26.75pie shaped portion of circular bar, coin? One unbroken, curved edge and two broken, straight edges.</p><p><br /></p><p>2. Aes Signatum(?). A fragment, early 3rd century BC. AE. g. 32.04 R. mm. 20 x 21. </p><p>* 15.7 thick, at highest point X 28.6 X 20.8; edge piece of a bar with an unidentifiable shape. One unbroken, straight edge and three broken edges. The broken edges have high points that are worn or otherwise smoothed.</p><p><br /></p><p>3. Aes Signatum(?). A fragment, early 3rd century BC. AE. g. 48.82 R. mm 19 x 48. </p><p>* 19.1 thick, at highest point X 48.8 wide (but bar was probably 10 to 15 mm wider) X 15 average length; this looks to be a piece of a bar that was taller in the center and thinner on the edges. One very short unbroken, edge and three broken edges.</p><p><br /></p><p>4. Aes Signatum(?). A 'Ramo secco'(?) fragment, early 3rd cent. BC. AE. g. 31.65 RR. mm 26 x 29. </p><p>* 13.8 thick X 28.7 X 26.1. This piece looks a bit like Vecchi #8. The piece of a bar has a single raised line (stem?) down the center of the raised side. I do not see branches, but there could be one at one broken end. The piece has one unbroken side and three broken sides.</p><p><br /></p><p>Oops, looks like my Word formatting was lost, but it looks readable.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="rrdenarius, post: 2284190, member: 75525"]A little bit better description of the pieces above. I did not see exact matches of any of the Ramo Seco pieces in Thurlow & Vecchi or Vecchi. I will need some time to look at the copies of Aes Grave, E J Haeberlin and Le Monete dell’Italia antica, Raffaele Garrucci to see if I can find a better match for the RS pieces. Both books are available for free download, see my blog for RR references. # - description 1. Aes formatum. Lot of three fragments, late 4th-early 3rd century BC. AE. g. 48.61; g. 22.25; g. 12.03. a. 11.2 thick X 38.0 wide X 31.55 long. Looks like the end piece of a bar with rounded ends. Thinner at edge. One unbroken and two broken edges. b. 9.1 thick X 33.2 X 18.8; edge piece of a bar, thin at edge & thicker away from edge. One unbroken, straight edge and two broken edges. c. 6.4 thick X 21.0 X 26.75pie shaped portion of circular bar, coin? One unbroken, curved edge and two broken, straight edges. 2. Aes Signatum(?). A fragment, early 3rd century BC. AE. g. 32.04 R. mm. 20 x 21. * 15.7 thick, at highest point X 28.6 X 20.8; edge piece of a bar with an unidentifiable shape. One unbroken, straight edge and three broken edges. The broken edges have high points that are worn or otherwise smoothed. 3. Aes Signatum(?). A fragment, early 3rd century BC. AE. g. 48.82 R. mm 19 x 48. * 19.1 thick, at highest point X 48.8 wide (but bar was probably 10 to 15 mm wider) X 15 average length; this looks to be a piece of a bar that was taller in the center and thinner on the edges. One very short unbroken, edge and three broken edges. 4. Aes Signatum(?). A 'Ramo secco'(?) fragment, early 3rd cent. BC. AE. g. 31.65 RR. mm 26 x 29. * 13.8 thick X 28.7 X 26.1. This piece looks a bit like Vecchi #8. The piece of a bar has a single raised line (stem?) down the center of the raised side. I do not see branches, but there could be one at one broken end. The piece has one unbroken side and three broken sides. Oops, looks like my Word formatting was lost, but it looks readable.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
My Aes Rude - or Am I Rude?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...