Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Rick Crissman, post: 3389053, member: 101891&quot;]Through 5Xs, 10X&#039;s, 20X&#039;s and 40X&#039;s I looked at two NGC Silver Kennedys.&nbsp; One was PF-69 and the other was PF-70.&nbsp; The mirrored surface on both coins was perfect. The raised areas of the PF-69 was also perfect under all levels of zoom.&nbsp; The PF-70 had 3 scratches.&nbsp; One was visable at 5X&#039;s but the other 2 needed 10X&#039;s or higher.&nbsp; The PF-70 also had far more darkness from weaker strike in the hair along the part line on Kennedy&#039;s head.&nbsp; The PF-70 had a starting invoice number of 481.&nbsp; The PF-69 was one I had graded after owning the PF-70.&nbsp; My invoice number started with 471.&nbsp; My intent was to upgrade from a PF-70 to a nicer PF-70.&nbsp; NGC degraded my perfect coin. I feel with the invoice number being lower, it was code to give a better grade to a really good long term NGC customer. Do I live with the nicer PF-69 or do I sell the PF-69 just because NGC said it was better?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in