Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;charley, post: 8304040, member: 5372&quot;]Preach that condescending Grading Philosophical Religion, Brother!</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>...that your need to be condescending to members when you post is not only annoying, but rude, and rude to the extreme when you continuously do so?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Now we are getting somewhere! It is you, not the other guy.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Here we go, again. Explain technical grading, and the only 3 things that make up technical grading, and the changes in the 2nd and 3rd edition that are different from the 6th or 7th editions, that describe the 9 points of grading, that don&#039;t match with the 6 points in the 4th edition, and......what did this supposed technical grading leave out that has confused you and converted you into being a disciple that assumes philosophy is fact?</p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, I know....buy the books to understand the gobbledygobbledness.</p><p><br /></p><p>Sigh.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Well, what is it?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in