Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;KSorbo, post: 6397752, member: 56370&quot;]In the current market it seems there is a premium placed on original toning by PCGS and CAC even if it is butt ugly like the quarter.&nbsp; I would be afraid of the market eventually shifting toward coins that have been attractively dipped or lightly cleaned, versus original but ugly.&nbsp; It’s one thing to spend 100 bucks on a turd with the right label for a registry set, but quite another to spend 4 or 5 figures.&nbsp; For that money I would want something that blows me away.&nbsp; Why should an UNC details with light hairlines sell for a bigger discount than something with ugly toning?&nbsp; Neither are representative of what the coin looked like coming off the press.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in