Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Troodon, post: 1930981, member: 4626&quot;]With those pictures I&#039;d definitely say 65 or 66.&nbsp; 66 is kind of iffy still IMO, but it&#039;s at least a 65.&nbsp; However I have seen 65&#039;s worse than this one, so 66 is not impossible.&nbsp; The devices are nicely struck and there&#039;s almost no marks on them; that will probably count for something.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you send this to PCGS would love to hear how it came back.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in