Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Cliff Reuter, post: 7778203, member: 115140&quot;]IMHO this is an impaired proof. Lighting is definitely making it difficult to know for sure. There appear to be some circulation marks.</p><p><br /></p><p>The devices/letters of EPU being well defined and &quot;thin&quot; are the best indicators for me.</p><p><br /></p><p>EDIT: I forgot to add that there also appears to be some frosting on the letters on the reverse.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Thank you for this link. I was aware of the two re-engraved dies for 1953 but not this one for 1950.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is a second proof variety DDR-001 but this coin doesn&#039;t exhibit any Class 6 thickness on the reverse devices that I can see.</p><p><a href="http://varietyvista.com/01a%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%201/1950PDDR001.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/01a%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%201/1950PDDR001.htm" rel="nofollow">http://varietyvista.com/01a LC Doubled Dies Vol 1/1950PDDR001.htm</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in