Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Most undervalued coin
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Caleb, post: 1363124, member: 32795"]<font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3"><span style="color: #000000">WOW ….. Someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed.:devil:</span></font></font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3"><span style="color: #000000">Being a member of a chart room or message board does not make you a member of the parent organization. The “Ike Group” is a small select group of people that have established a message board among other things. If someone receives permission to post on the message boards’ belonging to the “Ike Group”, that doesn’t mean that they are full fletched members of the parent organization.:rollling:</span></font></font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3"><span style="color: #000000">As far as giving or receiving credit for a “find”, this is all just ‘hog wash’. Who is to say that someone didn’t find the same variety years ago? CONECA doesn’t list anyone as finding (discovering) a variety, Dr. Wiles will list who “reported” the variety to CONECA in the master listings. I submit that reporting a variety to be included within the master files is different then discovering / finding the variety in the first place. Example, I purchased a 1973-S Kennedy half dollar from another collector that saves varieties, the doubling on the reverse was unique, we submitted the coin to Dr. Wiles and he gave it a new listing as the DDR-003. I did not find (discover) the coin in question but we are mentioned as “reporting” the coin to CONECA.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></font></font></p><p><br /></p><p><font size="3"><span style="color: #000000"><font face="Times New Roman">The same goes with your coin, if ANACS (John Roberts) is the one that submitted the coin to CONECA then Dr. Wiles should maintain CONECA’S records as who submitted the coin to him for review period. If it meant that much to you, you should have submitted the coin directly to Dr. Wiles yourself. </font></span></font></p><p><br /></p><p><font size="3"><span style="color: #000000"><font face="Times New Roman">Just my two cents on the subject <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></font></span></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Caleb, post: 1363124, member: 32795"][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000]WOW ….. Someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed.:devil:[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000]Being a member of a chart room or message board does not make you a member of the parent organization. The “Ike Group” is a small select group of people that have established a message board among other things. If someone receives permission to post on the message boards’ belonging to the “Ike Group”, that doesn’t mean that they are full fletched members of the parent organization.:rollling:[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000]As far as giving or receiving credit for a “find”, this is all just ‘hog wash’. Who is to say that someone didn’t find the same variety years ago? CONECA doesn’t list anyone as finding (discovering) a variety, Dr. Wiles will list who “reported” the variety to CONECA in the master listings. I submit that reporting a variety to be included within the master files is different then discovering / finding the variety in the first place. Example, I purchased a 1973-S Kennedy half dollar from another collector that saves varieties, the doubling on the reverse was unique, we submitted the coin to Dr. Wiles and he gave it a new listing as the DDR-003. I did not find (discover) the coin in question but we are mentioned as “reporting” the coin to CONECA.:rolleyes:[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Times New Roman]The same goes with your coin, if ANACS (John Roberts) is the one that submitted the coin to CONECA then Dr. Wiles should maintain CONECA’S records as who submitted the coin to him for review period. If it meant that much to you, you should have submitted the coin directly to Dr. Wiles yourself. [/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Times New Roman]Just my two cents on the subject :)[/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Most undervalued coin
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...