Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Most Overpriced Ancient Coin
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3135233, member: 19463"]My definition of overpriced usually goes with ancient coins desired by people who do not collect ancient coins and which are referred to by a name other than that that would describe a 'regular' coin. That means a 'denarius of Tiberius' may not be overpriced but a 'Tribute Penny' probably is. A tetradrachm of Athens??? - 'Owl'. There are exceptions to this but demand increases greatly when there is added demand from people with money to spend and no inclination to learn about such things as supply or grading who believe that all ancients are museum specimens. </p><p><br /></p><p>A question: What is required to make a coin a "Widow's Mite"? There was a time for reasons I never understood that the term usually referred to anchor/wheel coins of Alexander Jannaeus who died about a century before the story related in the Bible could have taken place. Certainly many of these circulated for a long time and we have no real evidence of the most common bits of metal in use c.30AD. Is it OK to use the term for any small Jewish coin? ....even types made well after the time of the Ministry? </p><p>[ATTACH=full]800469[/ATTACH] </p><p>Yes, it is upside down.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3135233, member: 19463"]My definition of overpriced usually goes with ancient coins desired by people who do not collect ancient coins and which are referred to by a name other than that that would describe a 'regular' coin. That means a 'denarius of Tiberius' may not be overpriced but a 'Tribute Penny' probably is. A tetradrachm of Athens??? - 'Owl'. There are exceptions to this but demand increases greatly when there is added demand from people with money to spend and no inclination to learn about such things as supply or grading who believe that all ancients are museum specimens. A question: What is required to make a coin a "Widow's Mite"? There was a time for reasons I never understood that the term usually referred to anchor/wheel coins of Alexander Jannaeus who died about a century before the story related in the Bible could have taken place. Certainly many of these circulated for a long time and we have no real evidence of the most common bits of metal in use c.30AD. Is it OK to use the term for any small Jewish coin? ....even types made well after the time of the Ministry? [ATTACH=full]800469[/ATTACH] Yes, it is upside down.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Most Overpriced Ancient Coin
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...