Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;cphine, post: 766273, member: 20940&quot;]Oh, don&#039;t be sorry.&nbsp; I appreciate the info.</p><p>It&#039;s funny how the picture brings out what you see on the cheek as wear.&nbsp; You can&#039;t see it when viewing the coin in person.&nbsp; It does have this sort of oily residue on it though...I think that&#039;s what&#039;s making it look that way.</p><p>The specs I think are from the cardboard it&#039;s currently housed in.&nbsp; I&#039;d love to remove them, but don&#039;t want to touch the coin.&nbsp;&nbsp; Also, the reflectiveness is just the bad lighting I have...it&#039;s actually quite uniform in person.</p><p>In either case, you&#039;ve confirmed my initial thoughts.&nbsp; I essentially got the Morgan&#039;s for free anyway, so it&#039;s not like I&#039;m out 100 bucks. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I think what really confuses me, and the reason I wanted some second opinions, is that on the NGC site you can look through high res pictures of coins they have graded.&nbsp; Mine looks better than some they have at MS 64...some of which are covered in scratches and dents that mine doesn&#039;t have.&nbsp; On the other hand, they have some at AU55 that look better than mine.&nbsp; It all seems so subjective.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Anyway, thanks.&nbsp; To the 2x2!</p><p>~Christian[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in