Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 2358889, member: 37839&quot;]I agree completely.&nbsp; The pictures are awful, as it is very had to get a good shot of a DMPL--even if one goes to manual settings, the reflectivity will fool even the best metering system in any camera.&nbsp; The angle shot of the back would be my best guess as to how the coin really looks.&nbsp; It is definitely highly reflective and the surfaces of the reverse look clean.&nbsp; The obverse straight on shot is dreadful--is that toning, reflectivity that fooled the meter of the camera, or just some rough surfaces?&nbsp; Given the grade, I would think it is just a terrible photograph.&nbsp; &nbsp; I think it is an exposure situation with the camera--awful photography.&nbsp; I&#039;d take a chance on that coin for that price.&nbsp; If I didn&#039;t have that date as both a PL and a DMPL, I would have pulled the trigger already.&nbsp; Nothing to risk, as there is a return policy.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in