Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Morgan Dollar Set Thoughts
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="messydesk, post: 2968423, member: 1765"]When buying common dates in high grade, be sure to spend the time to choose coins that are really attractive. There are coins in 65, 66, and 67 holders that don't belong in those holders. I've seen 65s that belong in details holders. Auction lot viewing will really help you with this, as you can often lay out 10 1880-S in 66 side by side and pick the best two that are worthy of an extra $10. Instant advantage over every online bidder who hasn't seen coins in hand.</p><p><br /></p><p>Absolutely agree with this. Even though an 81-S in 67 is relatively common and aren't going to go up in value due to their rarity, they can be stunning. You'll want to leave it on your desk to become distracted by it. Be choosy, though.</p><p><br /></p><p>Yeah, I have an 1894 in at PCGS for crossover that the owner (not me) has invested a lot of grading fees in. Lowballs aren't for everyone, but if you like them, more power to you.</p><p><br /></p><p>I would be remiss if I didn't also encourage finding coins to fit into your date set that were interesting and/or rare die varieties. 80-S has some overdates that aren't rare, 81-S has a couple with nice reverse die breaks that are worth premiums. 78-S had many dies touched up in San Francisco with various devices and materials, a practice for which the SF mint was eventually reprimanded a couple years later. 79-S through 82-S all have some repunched mint marks, too. The early CC coins are generally a mess, which variety collectors like.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="messydesk, post: 2968423, member: 1765"]When buying common dates in high grade, be sure to spend the time to choose coins that are really attractive. There are coins in 65, 66, and 67 holders that don't belong in those holders. I've seen 65s that belong in details holders. Auction lot viewing will really help you with this, as you can often lay out 10 1880-S in 66 side by side and pick the best two that are worthy of an extra $10. Instant advantage over every online bidder who hasn't seen coins in hand. Absolutely agree with this. Even though an 81-S in 67 is relatively common and aren't going to go up in value due to their rarity, they can be stunning. You'll want to leave it on your desk to become distracted by it. Be choosy, though. Yeah, I have an 1894 in at PCGS for crossover that the owner (not me) has invested a lot of grading fees in. Lowballs aren't for everyone, but if you like them, more power to you. I would be remiss if I didn't also encourage finding coins to fit into your date set that were interesting and/or rare die varieties. 80-S has some overdates that aren't rare, 81-S has a couple with nice reverse die breaks that are worth premiums. 78-S had many dies touched up in San Francisco with various devices and materials, a practice for which the SF mint was eventually reprimanded a couple years later. 79-S through 82-S all have some repunched mint marks, too. The early CC coins are generally a mess, which variety collectors like.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Morgan Dollar Set Thoughts
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...