Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BUncirculated, post: 1117853, member: 29581&quot;]The 04 is heavily damaged as GDJMSP pointed out, possibly from being a setting in a piece of jewelry and pried out with a flathead or something. Notice the twisted rim from 3 - 4 o&#039;clock on the reverse as well as at the top 11 o&#039;clock same side. </p><p><br /></p><p>The 1892, I agree with&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Without the chance of examining both in hand, it would be impossible to authenticate from a photo.</p><p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in